MICHAEL Gove and George Galloway sparked an angry reaction last night when they questioned who should get to vote in a second Scottish independence referendum.
Galloway, who is currently leading the anti-independence Alliance for Unity party, tweeted to say that if there is an indyref2 then people born in Scotland but now living across the rest of the UK should be able to vote.
The former Labour MP wrote: “.. 795,000 Scots living elsewhere in the UK MUST have a vote. If UK expats can vote in General Elections from Spain then an existential question like separatism MUST be answered by all Scots.”
Galloway tagged Gove in his post, who replied late last night to note that it was an “interesting question”.
Interesting question https://t.co/jJnxe4fyAr
— Michael Gove (@michaelgove) August 19, 2020
The Tory minister’s comment came after another poll showing majority support for Scottish independence – this time a Panelbase survey showing backing for Yes at 55%.
In the 2014 independence referendum, all EU or Commonwealth citizens living in Scotland and over the age of 16 could vote. The Referendums (Scotland) Act 2020 features the same rules.
At Westminster elections voters are not required to have a permanent address in the UK, but they must be a British citizen living abroad who has been registered to vote there within the last 15 years.
Gove and Galloway’s questioning of the future voting rules was branded a “slippery slope” by political blogger Jon Worth, while former SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson said their comments were “undemocratic”.
Worth asked: “Are they then going to demand those born in England but now resident in Scotland cannot vote in the referendum too? This has to be - as 2014 was - based on residence only. There’s no decent other way.”
With polls now showing a consistent majority in favour of Scottish independence its opponents in Westminster consider changing the electorate an ‘interesting question’. Looks desperate, and undemocratic. #indyref2 #Scotland https://t.co/98K93G7IfR
— Angus Robertson (@AngusRobertson) August 20, 2020
Robertson commented: “With polls now showing a consistent majority in favour of Scottish independence its opponents in Westminster consider changing the electorate an ‘interesting question’. Looks desperate, and undemocratic.”
Meanwhile, the SNP’s longest serving MP Pete Wishart replied to the Tory minister to ask: “In what way, Michael? Sure you will be able to share your view on any future franchise with your SNP 'shadow'? Then again we know how this works …”
Many other Twitter users questioned how a Scot living elsewhere in the UK could be identified for the purpose of legislating any new rule.
Meanwhile, former SNP MSP Marco Biagi disagreed with the current UK system. "UK emigrants in Spain shouldn't be able to vote in UK General Elections. Next question," he wrote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel