CABINET Office minister Michael Gove has been mocked for a “desperate” scheme to save the Union involving talks with George Galloway, Jack McConnell and Danny Alexander.
According to a report in The Times, the Tory minister has responded to increasing support for Scottish independence by holding private discussions with his old political rivals.
A source said Gove discussed strategy with former Labour MP Galloway, who is leading the anti-independence Alliance for Unity party into next year’s Holyrood elections.
The controversial figure stood in last year’s General Election, coming sixth in the West Bromwich East seat with less than 500 votes.
READ MORE: Michael Gove teams up with old political rivals in efforts to stop independence
Sources said there had been no “detailed co-ordination” between Gove and Galloway, but it was understood the pair know each other well.
Earlier this week they sparked a row over voting rights when Galloway demanded Scots living across the UK should have a say in a new independence referendum. Gove said it was an “interesting question”.
The Cabinet Office minister was also said to have discussed plans for a UK-wide internal market with former Labour first minister McConnell – these proposals have been called the “biggest power grab yet” on Holyrood by the Constitutional Relations Secretary.
The policy has received fierce criticism from all Scottish Parliament parties besides the Scottish Tories.
News of the Unionist team was widely mocked, with SNP depute leader Keith Brown doubting the capability of those involved in the talks to drastically change views on independence.
Polls in recent weeks have put support for Yes at 53%, 54% and 55%.
Brown said: "He must be really desperate if he hopes to find inspiration from an unelected lord and a LibDem who was Scots Secretary for all of two weeks.
“Mr Gove is already on record as saying ‘it wouldn’t be fair’ to change the franchise rules for a second referendum, and the 2014 vote, based on residency, set the gold standard.”
On Twitter, independence supporters branded the group “Better Together 2.0”. Other politicians joined in with ridiculing the Tory minister.
Are these the ‘others’? https://t.co/yCtiaGGZII pic.twitter.com/60ZLvDRgpY
— Ronnie Cowan MP (@ronniecowan) August 21, 2020
SNP MP Ronnie Cowan shared a picture of a group of clowns asking if they were the others involved in the talks.
Pete Wishart added: "'George Galloway, Danny Alexander, Jack McConnell'. I never knew that the Union case was in such a dilapidated and threadbare condition.
"They must surely know it's all over for them now ..."
The MP also noted that Gove seemed to have a more prominent role in promoting the Union of late. “For what it’s worth I think Michael Gove will lead the Union case in the next referendum,” he said.
“It can only be him or Ruth and she is just so tarnished and diminished now and he is the UK’s next most prominent Scot. God help them …”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel