A GROUP aiming to prove Scotland can hold a new independence referendum without first receiving permission from Westminster has smashed its £155,000 target ahead of schedule.
Forward As One launched the People’s Action on Section 30 campaign last year and began fundraising when Boris Johnson rejected Nicola Sturgeon’ request for a transfer of powers to allow a new vote to be held.
The group has employed one of Scotland’s top lawyers. Earlier this year they issued the Advocate General with pre-litigation correspondence, and received a response that the UK Government doesn’t believe Holyrood can hold indyref2 without their consent.
In March a court summons was issued, but Forward As One says since then it has had to deal with several administrative motions.
READ MORE: Date set for Yes group's hearing in Section 30 court case
The group hoped to raise £155,000 to help prepare for a legal debate – and thanks to a strategic social media effort has smashed the target. They previously predicted they would reach that figure on Monday or Tuesday.
Organiser Martin Keatings put out a statement as the crowdfunder hit the target.
“Give them direction, a challenge, and let it be done,” he said. “This is the spirit that is at the core of our movement.
“£155,000 was a massive target, and reaching it, a challenge of unparalleled proportions in such uncertain times. But what price do you put on the future prospects of the right to define who and what we are as a nation and to leave a nation to future generations, better than the one we inherited?”
He said it was clear from the success of the fundraising exercise that the people no longer want the “ambiguity” of Section 30 hanging above them.
“I intend to honour their support and have this question answered,” Keatings said. “For their support I give them my gratitude, which I ultimately feel can never be sufficient thanks for their belief in this case, but none the less they have it. Now let’s get it done.”
The group managed to knock Steve Bannon’s arrest off Twitter’s trending list earlier this week when they co-ordinated a mass-posting of the hashtag #PeoplesAS30.
The Court of Session in Edinburgh will begin to hear the case on September 30, it was revealed this week.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel