WE are in a world closed down but also opening up, a world full of contradictions, pain and joy. Our mood and our energy loops and crashes as we try to endure the lockdown and the prospect of life with Covid and with capitalism. Responses to the current crisis have exposed both the fragility of our structures and our institutions and people’s remarkable resilience.
While we moan about other peoples’ behaviour and our (various) governments, you can’t help also be amazed by the hard work and care that is being put into supporting each other.
If you view the world through the prism of social media it can look like a grim dystopia of deaths captured by dash cams and the world’s tyrants and bigots at play.
But viewing the world through a child’s eye, or that of a friend or someone special, it can look very different – full of wonder, full of possibility.
This is the lens the Situationists were using when they daubed their graffiti on Paris streets in 1968 declaring: “Soyez réalistes, demandez l’impossible” (“Be realistic, demand the impossible”) and it’s worth remembering if the weight of the world is lying heavy on you.
READ MORE: 'He must be really desperate': Scots react to Gove's 'Better Together 2.0' plan
In this weirdest of years everything is possible: home-schooling, the mass extension of university places, UBI, radical experiments in active travel, bikes, e-scooters, streets closed to traffic to make space for people, the appreciation of nature and ecology, the regulation of short-term lets that distort housing.
We’ve even had a 9.3% reduction in humanity’s ecological footprint compared with the same period last year. David Lin, who led the research team behind something called Earth Overshoot Day, found that there was a major drop in CO2 emissions (down 14.5% compared with the same period in the previous year) and in commercial forestry (down 8.4% on 2019). All of these gains are fragile and likely to be lost if the politicians (and us) race back to normal with unseemly glee and unity in our commitment to our death wish.
Constitutionally too what a month ago seemed impossible now seems inevitable. For the last six months or more the Scottish democracy movement has been racked with self-doubt and doom with a self-fulfilling analysis that we are and would be forever powerless under the mighty yoke of the British state and its accompanying tendrils of broadcast propaganda.
Yet last week, suddenly, this seemed all less credible. As Boris holidays in some obscured part of Scotland, his new advisers have apparently began to abandon the idea that the plan should be to forever resist and refuse a Section 30 order. Someone somewhere came to their senses and realised this was an indefensible position.
As polling begins to rise and rise month after month predicting a huge 27-seat pro-independence majority at Holyrood and the inexorable rise of support for independence, something looking very like blind panic has set in at No 10.
So we’re told that Michael Gove has held private talks with senior figures from across the political spectrum in an attempt to find a way to save the Union in the face of rising support for independence.
The Times tells us: “Discussions have taken place with a wide range of notable names including Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale, the former Scottish Labour first minister, and Danny Alexander, the former LibDem chief secretary to the Treasury. George Galloway, the socialist firebrand who is planning to run for Holyrood, has also been sounded out.”
It is understood that Gove has contacted a range of Unionist politicians over the past six months after being given greater control over Westminster’s strategy for keeping the UK together.”
I think “senior figures” may be a bit of a stretch here, but you can see the thinking: triangulate a non-Tory triumvirate to spearhead and advise – the dashing rhetoric of Galloway, the resolute solidity of McConnell and, er, whatever Danny Alexander’s good at.
The news filtered out with the caveat that the cunning plan would be accompanied by a bid to alter the franchise to either extend the vote to any Scot living anywhere in the UK and/or make the vote unavailable to 16 and 17-year-olds.
But while there are multiple problems with this, it didn’t prevent people who enjoy lathering themselves in doom from declaring that all was still dire and we were indeed never going to see the light of a referendum ever, ever again.
READ MORE: Michael Gove ‘appears to accept’ indyref2 is coming
The problem for those addicted to doom, and for Gove’s unlikely trio, is that this has already been legislated for.
The Referendums (Scotland) Act 2020 (section 4), states:
Those who are entitled to vote:
A person is entitled to vote in the referendum if, on the date on which the poll at the referendum is held, the person is—
(a) aged 16 or over,
(b) registered in the register of local government electors maintained under section 9(1)(b) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 for any area in Scotland,
(c) not subject to any legal incapacity to
vote (age apart) (see section 5), and
(d) a Commonwealth citizen, a citizen of the Republic of Ireland or a relevant citizen of the European Union.
They can’t change that. This is a non-starter from political and media activists who don’t know what they are doing.
BUT, as they say, don’t interrupt your enemy when they’re making a mistake. If Gove and co really think that the loquacious George Galloway is the answer to their terminal constitutional decline, then all is well. One of the many delights of the coming political battle will be seeing Galloway working closely with the Conservative far-right. Another is seeing Ruth Davidson and Boris Johnson sharing a stage.
Galloway last stood for election in December 2019 when he ran in the West Bromwich East parliamentary seat. He came sixth with 489 votes. When he stood in Glasgow in 2011 under a Unionist “anti-cuts banner”, he mustered only 3.3% and lost his deposit. He is not the titan they think he is and his influence is so diminished their faith in him and his political acumen is an amusement more than a threat.
The problem for the Conservatives (and Unionists) is that gerrymandering the vote (in whatever way they can) will look like what it is – a grubby attempt to cling on to power and to resist democratic change.
A solution for the Unionist bloc would be to create a vision of the future that could engage and unite Scots in sufficient numbers to (re)commit to the project.
If that seemed elusive in 2014 it seems other-worldly in 2020. The vision of a “nation of equals” has been obliterated by the process and contempt of Brexit, and the idea of Britain as a financially sound source of stability is wrecked as we experience the UK’s worst recorded recession and UK Government debt has topped
£2 trillion for the first time and now stands at 100.5% of gross domestic product (GDP).
READ MORE: Andrew Neil accused of joining 'unholy alliance' to 'rig' indyref2 rules
The idea of Britain as a gateway to – and a guarantor of our place in – Europe was slam-shut by the delirium of Brexit and is about to be given extra sheen by our No-Deal exit. This reality has faded in the sheer horror of the virus but will be re-awakened at the turn of the year as the economic reality of No Deal looms large.
That this was all an entirely self-inflicted act of self-harm – culturally, geopolitically and economically – will provide an indefensible backdrop to both the Holyrood election and the coming referendum. The Unionist forces prepare for those battles with not only their personnel significantly diminished and discredited but their key arguments in tatters.
The democracy movement should in these circumstances do the following:
First of all, take nothing for granted in terms of our expectations of how dirty and deceptive this campaign will be. Given the players’ backstory and what we know of their modus operandi we can expect more of the same: dark money, black ops and propaganda.
Second, we need to avoid re-running the 2014 campaign at all costs.
Third, we have holes in our arguments that need mended and mended quickly. Repeating endlessly that all of this should have been done years ago takes us nowhere.
Fourth, we need to “step in” and “step up”. We have given our opponents too much respect and ceded too much power. It’s time to start winning. Everything is possible.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel