NICOLA Sturgeon once again showed up Ruth Davidson during today’s FMQs session as the Tory had the “brass neck to lecture the rest of us on scrutiny and accountability” while preparing to take her seat in the House of Lords.
Davidson was gifted a Tory peerage by Boris Johnson earlier this summer and will take her seat in Westminster next year.
In Holyrood today Davidson asked the First Minister why her Referendums Bill, announced during yesterday’s Programme for Government, is “more urgent” than an Education Bill.
The SNP leader defended her government’s work to improve and reform education, adding that this remains a “priority” for ministers.
READ MORE: Independence: Nicola Sturgeon to unveil referendum plans
“But on a basic matter of democracy I believe it is for the people of Scotland to choose their own future,” Sturgeon added. “I’ll argue that case in a democratic election, people will have the ability to decide in the way that they vote and if they endorse my view that there should be a referendum on independence people then will have the right to choose Scotland’s future.
“Fundamentally, Presiding Officer, I believe in democracy. I think we now know that Ruth Davidson doesn’t.”
Davidson went on criticising the Scottish Government, asking if any additional money to respond to the challenges of the coronavirus crisis in the education sector will go directly to schools and head teachers.
The First Minister replied: “The money is precisely to allow local authorities and teachers and schools to decide the different ways in which they think it is appropriate to let students catch up,” before giving further details of where the funds will go.
But the Tory MSP said Sturgeon’s government seems happy to accept “second-best” rather than try to improve education further and ensure pupils can catch up after months off school, adding that she thinks this is “unacceptable” and parents will agree.
Davidson said she wasn’t sure that accepting students will learn less this year as a result of coronavirus is “good enough”.
Ruth Davidson’s demand for accountability, while she's got a ticket to ride the House of Lords' red benches for life, shredded again #fmqs pic.twitter.com/HI1cEEhZ07
— Phantom Power (@PhantomPower14) September 2, 2020
The former Scottish Tory leader went on: “I know the First Minister doesn’t like to be asked questions on her record but the fact is she deserves to be challenged on this. Because it was her who said education was her number one priority, not us.”
The First Minister hit back with another blistering attack on Davidson’s “hypocrisy”.
She told her: “Can I say to Ruth Davidson not only am I perfectly willing and happy to have questions asked of me on my record, my policies and my plans, I’m happy to allow the Scottish people to judge that in an election. Instead we have Ruth Davidson who wants to continue to be a politician but without the consent of a single person across this country.
“She’s heading to an unelected parliament but has the brass neck to lecture the rest of us on scrutiny and accountability.
“There is no ermine cloak in the world that will cover up that hypocrisy.
“On the issue of education we decided not to take the time and pass legislation but to get on with all of the things that would have been in that bill without the need for legislation.
“We are investing record sums in closing the attainment gap. We are supporting young people through this difficult period. And we will work with the SQA unlike other governments we won’t blame a body like the SQA, we will take responsibility and we will work with them to make sure that young people are supported and catch up in their education, that this crucial work to close the attainment gap and raise standards continues.
“We will be accountable for that before the Scottish people in just a few months time.”
Keep it up Ruth and you’ll see support for independence go even higher.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel