FORMER Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale has accepted that indyref2 is "unquestionably" happening.
Dugdale, who led the party for two years, said the SNP's lead at Holyrood means they will have a mandate to hold another referendum.
"For people who don't follow Scottish politics that closely, the SNP are miles ahead in the polls, a good 20% point lead on the Conservatives who are in second place," she said during a webinar hosted by British Future.
A recent poll put independence support at 55%, a reverse in the result of the 2014 indyref
READ MORE: Scottish independence: Yes support soars to 55 per cent in Panelbase poll
"They're [the SNP] are likely to have a majority in a Parliament which is not designed to produce majorities and a by-product of that is that there will unquestionably be a second independence referendum," Dugdale continued.
"If you look at current independence referendum polling there has been a considerable shift from No to Yes, around five or six percentage points in the last six months really."
A poll in June put the SNP on an incredible 53% of the constituency vote which would dramatically increase pressure on Boris Johnson to grant a Section 30 order to hold indyref2.
READ MORE: SNP set for huge Holyrood election win and mandate for indyref2
Dugdale quit Scottish Labour last year over its stance on Brexit and now is the director of the John Smith Centre for Public Service at Glasgow University.
📺 Kezia Dugdale gave her analysis on the current state of play in Scottish Politics.
— The YSI (@YSINational) September 5, 2020
🏴 She agrees that if the SNP win next years election Scotland will have a choice over it’s future.
🗳 Remember: The only way to guarantee an SNP majority is to make it #bothvotesSNP pic.twitter.com/nhsqIzdJgU
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel