A TORY minister has admitted the UK Government will break international law if it follows through with its plan to renege on the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement.
Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis justified the move by stressing it would be in a "very specific and limited way", claiming there are "clear precedents" for the UK and other countries which need to consider their international obligations as circumstances change.
His Labour counterpart Louise Haigh described the admission as "absolutely astonishing" and warned it would "seriously undermine" the UK's authority on the international stage.
The UK Government will introduce the Internal Market Bill tomorrow. It is designed to ensure goods from Northern Ireland continue to have unfettered access to the UK market while making clear EU state aid rules – which will continue to apply in Northern Ireland – will not apply in the rest of the UK.
READ MORE: The 10 funniest tweets about Tories breaking the law in a 'limited and specific way'
However, key parts of the Withdrawal Agreement, which sealed the UK's departure from the EU in January, will be overridden by the legislation.
Lewis told MPs the Government is "fully committed" to implementing the Withdrawal Agreement and the Northern Ireland protocol.
But he added the UK is taking "limited and reasonable steps to create a safety net" to allow it to deliver on its commitments to the people of Northern Ireland and keep in line with the protocol should outstanding issues not be resolved in talks with the EU.
READ MORE: Brexit deal chaos has made UK 'laughing stock of the world’
Conservative Sir Bob Neill, chairman of the Justice Select Committee, asked Lewis: "The Secretary of State has said that he is committed and the Government are committed to the rule of law. Does he recognise that adherence to the rule of law is not negotiable?
"Against that background, will he assure us that nothing that is proposed in this legislation does or potentially might breach international legal obligations or international legal arrangements that we have entered into?"
The Northern Ireland Secretary replied: "I would say to [Neill] that yes this breaks international law in a very specific and limited way.
"We are taking the power to dis-apply the EU concept of direct effect required by Article 4 in a certain, very tightly-defined circumstances."
He added that "there are clear precedents for the UK and indeed other countries needing to consider their international obligations as circumstances change".
READ MORE: Douglas Ross accuses SNP of 'treachery' as Westminster blames Holyrood over Brexit
Reacting after the Commons debate on Twitter, Neil wrote: "Well, it was a straight answer to a straight question. But a very troubling one nonetheless. Even as a 'contingency', a willingness to break international law sits ill for a county that has always prided itself on upholding the rule of law."
Well, it was a straight answer to a straight question. But a very troubling one nonetheless. Even as a “contingency”, a willingness to break international law sits ill for a county that has always prided itself on upholding the rule of law. https://t.co/BckgcYNfRF
— Sir Bob Neill MP (@neill_bob) September 8, 2020
Alliance Party leader Naomi Long added: "The Secretary of State for NI has just conceded in Parliament that Govt are about to break international law. His defence seems to be that 'it's only in a very limited way'.
"I'm not sure you can be a little bit illegal. It's a bit like being a little bit pregnant."
SNP MP Stewart Hosie, commenting on a clip of Lewis's statement in Parliament, wrote: "As each day passes the less the UK looks like a functioning liberal democracy."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel