SHETLAND-born, University of Edinburgh academic Mathew Nicolson writes for The National about the Shetland Isles' much-publicised look at self-determination.
YESTERDAY'S decision by the Shetland Islands Council to begin exploring options for "financial and political self-determination" has generated much interest in the national media.
Most discussion outside of Shetland has viewed this development through the prism of Scottish independence; one might be forgiven for thinking Shetland is on the brink of declaring its own independence from Scotland, or that this is simply a unionist plot to undermine the SNP.
Both interpretations fail to understand what Shetland’s Council or people actually want.
Shetland has always felt different. Only becoming part of Scotland in 1471, Shetland maintains a rich and distinct culture, expressed through music, literature and, most famously, the Norse-inspired Up Helly Aa fire festivals.
Shetland also possesses a strong local identity, which often takes precedence over British and Scottish identities.
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Do Shetland Islands really want to break away from Scotland?
It is not uncommon to hear some Shetlanders reject any association with Scotland, although a Scottish identity has grown over recent decades. In the most recent census, 78% of Shetlanders claimed some form of Scottish identity, compared to 27% British.
This is not the first time the notion of autonomy has raised its head in Shetland. The Shetland Islands Council pursued the idea between the 1970s and 1990s, as did the pro-autonomy Shetland Movement.
These autonomy campaigns ran out of steam in the 1990s and remained largely dormant until the 2014 Scottish independence referendum helped resurrect the idea.
It is true that much of this discontent is directed towards the SNP Government in Edinburgh, but opposition to Scottish independence is not the driving issue
The prospect of Shetland breaking away from an independent Scotland was often weaponised by the anti-independence camp, including by Shetland’s MP, Alistair Carmichael.
This rhetoric was not endorsed by the Council, which instead used the opportunity to promote, alongside Orkney and the Western Isles, a renewed focus on the islands and their form of government. This resulted in the Islands Act 2018 which devolved some control over coastlines to the Councils and aimed to "island-proof" new legislation.
The Council’s renewed interest in autonomy has more to do with discontent towards years of centralisation and funding cuts, and disappointment regarding the implementation of the Islands Act, than the issue of Scottish independence.
It is true that much of this discontent is directed towards the SNP Government in Edinburgh, but opposition to Scottish independence is not the driving issue – indeed, Shetland’s sole SNP councillor supported the motion.
READ MORE: Shetland Islands 'exploring options' for self-determination
Much will depend on how the Scottish Government responds. If Shetlanders feel the tide of centralisation and budget cuts continue unabated, support for autonomy will surely grow. But if the Government makes real efforts to meet the Council’s concerns, including the long-running matter of internal ferry funding, some councillors may conclude this goes far enough towards resolving Shetland’s grievances.
That one of Scotland’s peripheral Councils has emphatically rejected centralising policies by the Scottish Government certainly puts the SNP in an awkward position. It may even undermine the SNP’s moral case for independence.
But the decision to explore self-determination is not fundamentally linked to the question of Scottish independence and should instead be understood as a manifestation of Shetland’s desire for greater local control on its own terms, in whichever form this ultimately takes.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel