JOANNA Cherry has called on the SNP to rethink their strategy if Boris Johnson refuses to devolve the power necessary for a legally watertight second independence referendum.
Writing in The National today, the Edinburgh Central MP says the Internal Market Bill poses “potential problems for the strategy of staking all on the grant of a Section 30 order from this UK Government”.
Earlier this week, Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis shocked the Commons when he admitted that the new legislation would “break international law in a very specific and limited way”.
Cherry says the admission of illegality raises a number of questions.
She writes: “How should we deal with a Government that doesn’t obey international law?
"A Government that tries to oust the jurisdiction of the courts?
"A Government that is prepared to disregard the overwhelming mandate won for the current devolved settlement in the 1997 referendum?
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: UK is a rogue state, Scotland needs a more innovative strategy
“Just how does one negotiate with a rogue state? Is it reasonable to continue with a strategy designed for dealing with a state that obeys the rule of law and respects democratic mandates or is something a little more innovative required? The Scottish Government has not ruled out recourse to litigation either in respect of the provisions of this bill or, indeed, in respect of the future refusal of a Section 30 order.
“But what will we do if court action fails or if we win but this rogue Government refuses to respect the judgment of the court?
“For the time being at least, it has been made very clear to me that these are decisions above my pay grade, but they are decisions which will require to be taken nonetheless.”
Nicola Sturgeon has said a second independence referendum will be in the SNP manifesto.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel