EDINBURGH University's David Hume Tower has been renamed "40 George Square" following protests over the 18th century philosopher's racist writing.
Campus bosses said the decision had been taken “because of the sensitivities around asking students to use a building named after" someone whose "comments on matters of race, though not uncommon at the time, rightly cause distress today".
Nearly 1800 people signed a petition calling for the renaming of the building, organised by Phd student Elizabeth Lund.
She started the protest in July, in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis and the resulting global debate on race and historical institutional racism.
In her petition, Lund claimed the university was overlooking the philosopher’s racism “for the sake of alumni glory".
READ MORE: Was David Hume racist? Here's the Scottish philosopher's racist comment in full
She added: “Nobody is demanding we erase David Hume from history. However, we should not be promoting a man who championed white supremacy.
"That is mutually exclusive with the goal of reducing the harm caused by racism at Edinburgh University to students of colour.
“We can take Hume's writings and learn about them in context, but there is no reason the tallest building on campus should be named after him.”
The row stems from a notorious footnote in Hume’s 1753 essay Of National Character, where he wrote that he was “apt to suspect the negroes to be naturally inferior to the whites”.
In a statement, released late on Friday, the University said it was “important that campuses, curricula and communities reflect both the University’s contemporary and historical diversity and engage with its institutional legacy across the world".
“For this reason the university has taken the decision to re-name – initially temporarily until a full review is completed – one of the buildings in the Central Area campus.
“From the start of the new academic year the David Hume Tower will be known as 40 George Square.”
The decision has prompted anger on social media.
Christina Sommers, a former philosophy professor, tweeted: “My God. David Hume is cancelled. Shame on U of Edinburgh.”
READ MORE: David Hume: Was this great Scottish philosopher really a racist?
Sunder Katwala, the director of the British Future think tank tweeted: "I am sceptical that the university of Edinburgh has much evidence of a building being named after the famous 18th century Enlightenment philosopher David Hume causing 'distress' to contemporary students. This sounds like an imagined projection of hypothetical distress."
Dr Asanga Welikalam, Director of the university's Centre for Constitutional Law tweeted: "I do not agree with this decision. David Hume’s thought has inspired me throughout a 20 year career working to further constitutional democracy in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. As an employee of Edinburgh University I was not consulted in this."
Neil O'Brien, the Tory MP for Harborough, Oadby and Wigston called it a "cowardly, stupid, craven, pathetic, spineless, dumb thing to do".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel