BORIS Johnson’s plans to override the Brexit deal he agreed with Brussels threaten the Irish peace process, John Major and Tony Blair have warned.
In a high-profile intervention, the two former political rivals came together to urge MPs to reject the Internal Market Bill, which heads to the Commons today for its second reading.
There’s three days of debate scheduled, with votes planned tomorrow and on Wednesday.
They said the legislation imperils the Irish peace process, trade negotiations and the UK’s integrity.
In a joint article in the Sunday Times, the two former prime ministers said: “We both opposed Brexit. We both accept it is now happening.
“But this way of negotiating, with reason cast aside in pursuit of ideology and cavalier bombast posing as serious diplomacy, is irresponsible, wrong in principle and dangerous in practice,” they said.
READ MORE: Everything you need to know about a Brexit bill that ignores our values
“It raises questions that go far beyond the impact on Ireland, the peace process and negotiations for a trade deal – crucial though they are. It questions the very integrity of our nation.”
Their intervention means that four out of the five living former prime ministers have voiced concerns about the bill.
Both Gordon Brown and Theresa May have been critical.
Only David Cameron has kept silent so far. Though with the paperback edition of his memoirs released on Thursday, it’s thought he might speak out then.
DUP East Antrim MP Sammy Wilson said Blair and Major’s criticism was “bunkum”.
He said the Internal Market Bill was “far from perfect”, but added: “The suggestion by the hero of the peace process brigade that the bill rips apart the Belfast Agreement is complete and utter bunkum without any factual basis.
“They need to explain how making it easier for Northern Ireland to do business with our biggest market undermines the Belfast Agreement.”
Meanwhile, Labour leader Keir Starmer said his MPs would only support the bill if Johnson addressed “substantial” concerns.
He said that would mean scrapping clauses that could breach international law and the changes that have led to accusations of a “power grab” from the governments in Scotland and Wales.
“Labour is prepared to play its part in making that happen. If the Government fixes the substantial cross-party concerns that have been raised about the Internal Market Bill, then we are prepared to back it,” Starmer said.
“But if they do not, and the talks collapse, then it is their failure and incompetence that will have let the British people down.”
There is a sizeable Tory rebellion growing against the bill.
READ MORE: Scottish values are no longer compatible with the rogue nation the UK has become
The Tory chairman of the Commons defence committee, Tobias Ellwood, said on Saturday he could not support the legislation without it being changed.
“Already this bill is damaging brand UK, diminishing our role-model status as defender of global standards.
“As we go to the wire, let’s see more British statecraft – less Nixonian Madman Theory,” he tweeted.
Roger Gale, who also remained a vehement critic, told Times Radio: “If anybody is responsible, if it happens, for bringing the Union down, it will be [chief aide Dominic] Cummings and Mr Johnson.”
At least 20 Tory MPs are expected to back an amendment tabled by Bob Neill, the chair of the justice select committee.
Meanwhile, the French have made clear they are preparing for a No-Deal Brexit. Clement Beaune, the French Europe minister, said the EU remained “very united” and “will remain so. If the British multiply the knife blows in the contract, with the idea of dividing Europe, that will not work”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel