IN the absence of insight, most people would agree it’s usually best to say nothing at all.
The Jeremy Vine show, however, prefers to fill any knowledge void with idiotic speculation.
On no subject is this clearer than Scottish independence.
The Channel 5 programme has excelled at irritating viewers by broadcasting asinine opinions on the topic.
The latest of which came when the host asked if Nicola Sturgeon should be put in charge of the UK’s coronavirus response.
In response, the panellists described the First Minister as a “power mad despot” who can’t be trusted because she changes her clothes every day. The audience was also told independence is a terrible idea because “that’s not how it works”.
WATCH: Nicola Sturgeon branded a 'despot' in scandalous Jeremy Vine show clip
Here are four other times the Jeremy Vine show has lost the plot on Scottish independence.
Diana's Butler has his say
Perhaps the most notorious example came in June last year, when devolution expert Paul Burrell was invited on the show.
Also known for being Princess Diana’s former Butler, he warned that Scotland could simply cease to exist were it to be run from Edinburgh instead of Westminster.
“I think that the United Kingdom is stronger together than they are apart,” he pondered aloud. “I mean, for goodness sake, Scotland, by itself? How’s it going survive? It has … what does it have? … Oil, and a monster in a lake … and … whisky.”
SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald thanked the show for its contribution to the Yes campaign.
We really should thank @JeremyVineOn5 for providing @YesScot with excellent campaign clips 🏴👍🏻 https://t.co/jHMS9MJAT0
— Stewart McDonald MP (@StewartMcDonald) June 26, 2019
Hendry sets the record straight
A couple of weeks later, Vine addressed what he dubbed the “Burrell incident” after an SNP MP found an ingenious way of contributing some right-headed analysis to the show.
Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey MP Drew Hendry passed a note to Vine at a charity event which set the record straight on exactly what resources Scotland has.
READ MORE: SNP MP's brilliant reply to Scotland jibe on Jeremy Vine
The “Burrell incident” was ultimately the subject of an SNP complaint to Ofcom.
Brexiteer nonsense
And yet it seems no lessons were learned. Later that month, the programme treated us to yet more guff on the debate surrounding Scottish independence.
With usual host Vine elsewhere, it was stand-in Anne Diamond who this time facilitated the uninformed discussion found on the show. She asked guests Susie Boniface and Carole Malone – both journalists – whether they think Boris Johnson becoming PM increases the case for independence.
READ MORE: Scottish independence: Jeremy Vine Show misrepresents facts AGAIN
Boniface compared the situation facing Scotland – a nation of more than five million people – to that of Tunbridge Wells – a small English town.
Brexiteer Malone falsely claimed the latest polling suggested Brexit had not changed Scots’ opinions on independence. She then accused Nicola Sturgeon of trying to “whip up fear” about Brexit.
Mike Parry
And finally, journalist Mike Parry was invited to share his insights on the independence debate earlier this year. It went about as well as you’d expect.
You can always count on @mikeparry8 for a laugh due to his words of wisdom 😂 Seriously Mike, just how stupid are you? pic.twitter.com/xthJM5Zy7s
— Garry Ⓥ (@Macnessie) February 3, 2020
READ MORE: Mike Parry is fuming over Scottish independence in Jeremy Vine clip
"The one question that nobody can ever answer for me is if Scotland go on their own, where are they going to get all their money from?" He asked. "Scotland don’t have any money. Even if they got the right to draw money from the oil revenues, the oil is running out, there isn’t any oil.”
Vine, with Hendry’s words ringing in his ears, countered the point. But Parry wasn’t interested, stating he doesn’t want Scotland to “exist economically on its own”.
Fortunately, it’s not up to Mike Parry.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel