THE SNP's spokesperson on armed forces and veterans has hit out at the Tory Defence Minister for claiming he tried to discuss a controversial new bill with the party.
The UK Government's Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill, introduced by the Government in March, will create a five-year sunset clause for putting British soldiers on trial for alleged crimes and torture committed abroad.
Defence Minister Johnny Mercer, who is a former army officer, said he had tried to discuss the bill with the SNP but Carol Monaghan said this is not the case.
Mercer was responding to SNP MP Stewart McDonald's article in the Herald that said the bill will see Boris Johnson "blindly plough ahead with the erosion of the international rules-based order that the United Kingdom helped to create".
It went on: "The Overseas Operations Bill being brought forward this week would put a time limit on prosecutions for crimes committed by members of the Armed Forces, flouting the internationally agreed rules of warfare, effectively decriminalising torture and placing UK Armed Forces at greater risk as they carry out their work."
McDonald tweeted: "In today’s @heraldscotland: The Overseas Operations Bill doesn’t protect against false allegations. It’s bad for the armed forces, bad for the rule of law & concentrates power in the hands of the executive - that’s why senior military, legal and political opinion is against it."
In today’s @heraldscotland: The Overseas Operations Bill doesn’t protect against false allegations. It’s bad for the armed forces, bad for the rule of law & concentrates power in the hands of the executive - that’s why senior military, legal and political opinion is against it. pic.twitter.com/z4uHtN5cH3
— Stewart McDonald MP (@StewartMcDonald) September 22, 2020
Earlier this week Mercer insisted the proposed new legislation will protect service personnel from “vexatious” prosecutions after concerns about aspects of the move were raised by some senior military figures.
He said he has tried to discuss the matter with the SNP, tweeting: "It will come as a surprise to no-one that I have tried to engage Stewart and the SNP for months to constructively contribute to this bill and been met with deafening silence. And these lines are lies - we will not decriminalise torture and there is no time bar to prosecutions."
It will come as a surprise to no-one that I have tried to engage Stewart and the SNP for months to constructively contribute to this bill and been met with deafening silence.
— Johnny Mercer (@JohnnyMercerUK) September 22, 2020
And these lines are lies - we will not decriminalise torture and there is no time bar to prosecutions. https://t.co/kF0yqcmKIJ
But Monaghan said this is not the case, saying: "Hi @JohnnyMercerUK, I’m the SNP spokesperson on Armed Forces and Veterans. You have not contacted me once to discuss this bill. Is this what you consider engagement?"
Hi @JohnnyMercerUK , I’m the SNP spokesperson on Armed Forces and Veterans. You have not contacted me once to discuss this bill. Is this what you consider engagement? https://t.co/RJjBYTzUuF
— Carol Monaghan MP 🏴 (@CMonaghanSNP) September 22, 2020
Critics have said the legislation could make it harder to prosecute members of the armed forces for alleged offences overseas after more than five years has elapsed.
Britain’s human rights watchdog, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said such a move was “widely recognised” as being incompatible with international human rights standards.
General Sir Nick Parker, former commander of land forces, co-signed a letter to Johnson expressing worries about aspects of the bill.
Former head of the armed forces, Field Marshal Charles Guthrie, and Tory former defence minister Sir Malcolm Rifkind were also among those who wrote to the Prime Minister.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here