SCOTTISH and Southern Energy (SSE) last week announced a major contract for all the fabrication work for the 114 offshore wind turbines planned for the Seagreen array off the east coast of Fife.
Rather than to the currently mothballed BiFab yards in Methil and Burntisland, the work has gone, lock, stock and barrel, to China and the United Arab Emirates. Once more, Scotland is missing out on the downstream activity from major developments off shore.
This is not just a severe blow to the local economies in Methil and Burntisland, but to Scotland as a whole. To what extent did the decision-makers at SSE take account of their corporate social responsibilities; of the consequences for their carbon footprint and of the sustainability and security issues involved?
Last year the Sunday Times ran an article about SSE chair Richard Gillingwater, including the accusation he wasn’t spending enough time on the job due to “overboarding”. That is, he had other time-consuming and major jobs, including as chair of the London based-asset manager Janus Henderson where he is still in post.
In 2017 at a time of major concerns over household heating bills and single digit rises in pay for most workers, The Guardian reported that SSE awarded a staggering 72% rise in the remuneration of chief executive Alistair Phillips-Davies to £2.92 million. So much for corporate social responsibility.
There are big policy questions, too. The Scottish Government needs a more ambitious strategy for the “blue economy”. We need a stronger focus on the sustainable use of ocean resources involving a wide range of offshore and some on-shore activities, including downstream activities. Jobs, investment, climate change and sustainability issues are critically involved. Operations such as those in Fife should have a key role in such a national strategy.
We don’t need to wait for independence to be a more ambitious for Scotland.
Roger Mullin is a former SNP MP and is director of Momentous Change Ltd
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel