THE leader of the UK Liberal Democrats has doubled down on his party’s anti-independence referendum stance, despite falling behind the SNP in a UK-wide poll.
The SNP said this showed the “astonishing hypocrisy” of the "self-styled liberal democrats", adding that the party was “terrified of the people of Scotland having their say”.
Speaking to Andrew Marr today, LibDem leader Ed Davey was asked: “If the SNP win a majority in the next Holyrood elections on their manifesto, do they then have a mandate for an independence referendum next year?”
Davey replied: "Liberal Democrats do not want the separation of Scotland from the rest of the United Kingdom.
“We believe the family of nations should stick together and Liberal Democrats will be standing at the Holyrood elections in May to oppose a referendum.”
When Marr pressed on the issue, Davey added: “Liberal Democrat MSPs will have stood on a mandate to oppose that second referendum, won’t they, so we will vote against that.”
READ MORE: The SNP outpolled the LibDems across the UK - but does it matter?
However, the LibDems have by Davey’s own admission had three “very poor, very disappointing” general election results in just five years, and a new poll suggests their fortunes are not about to change.
Commissioned by The Observer and conducted by Opinium, the UK-wide poll released today had the LibDems winning just 5% of the votes.
This is especially poor when compared to the SNP. Despite only running in Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon’s party polled at 6% of the UK vote.
Labour overtook the Tories for the first time since the General Election, polling at 42% compared to the Conservatives’ 39.
For the poll, Opinium interviewed 2002 UK adults from September 23 to 25, 2020.
The LibDems are having a virtual conference this weekend at which the main topic of debate has been how to turn around their ailing fortunes.
Already, the party has said it was “distracted” by Brexit and has accepted that the EU debate is over for the “next few years”.
They will instead be aiming to “serve the community” and not focus on “particular interests”.
This echoes comments Davey made while on a “listening tour” of Scotland earlier this month.
The LibDem leader suggested Scottish independence was a “disruption” or “distraction” that did not currently interest people focused on the “things that matter”.
READ MORE: Shona Craven: I’m confused – could the real Ed Davey please stand up?
The SNP’s deputy Westminster leader Kirsten Oswald told The National that Scottish independence was not an issue for Davey and his UK LibDems to decide.
Oswald, who succeeded Kirsty Blackman in the deputy role this July, said: “The hypocrisy of the self-styled liberal democrats is astonishing. They were quick to demand a second vote on the Brexit result, saying the people had the right to change their minds.
“With polls consistently suggesting that independence is the majority position in Scotland, no wonder the Lib Dems are terrified of the people of Scotland having their say.
"Ultimately, it’s not for Ed Davey or any other politician to tell the people of Scotland whether or not they can have a referendum on independence - that decision should always be for the people of Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel