THE new Britain-wide poll from Opinium is a landmark in that it shows Labour ahead of the Tories for the first time since the 2019 General Election.
But perhaps of greater interest from a Scottish perspective is that it also shows the SNP ahead of the Liberal Democrats (by 6% to 5%) across the UK, which is quite an achievement when you consider that fewer than 10% of the poll's respondents are even eligible to be SNP voters.
This isn't a bolt from the blue, though - most recent polls have failed to show much clear water between the LibDems and the SNP, and there have been quite a few occasions when the two parties have been tied.
READ MORE: Ed Davey doubles down on indyref2 as LibDems fall behind SNP in UK poll
Of course, it would be bogus to present this as a proper horse-race, because the vast bulk of voters the LibDems have lost since their glory days are not in Scotland and have thus not gone to the SNP. But there is perhaps some concrete significance if the LibDems cease to be the undisputed third party across the UK in terms of popular vote, and if their challenger is the SNP rather than another London party.
Despite the SNP's status as the third party in the Commons since May 2015, the broadcasters have failed to abandon the paradigm of "the three major parties", which includes the LibDems but not the SNP. The popular vote has been one of the excuses for this. But if the SNP were firmly in third place in terms of both seats and votes, the excuses would start to run out.
Is it realistic to think that polls such as this will keep on coming? Possibly not.
The Opinium numbers may well have been caused by a statistical quirk, with the LibDems' vote at the lower end of the margin of error and the SNP at the higher end.
If the squeeze on the LibDems continues to the point where they appear to be a total irrelevance, it's not completely inconceivable that the SNP could build up a sustained polling advantage
Much depends on how Sir Ed Davey fares as LibDem leader, because it's next to impossible for the SNP to poll higher than around 6% in UK polls. If they were to consistently stay in third place, it would require the Lib Dems to slip to 5% or below, and more likely 3% or 4%.
Things don't look that grim for Davey yet, although he must be bitterly disappointed not to have secured any bounce after being confirmed as full-time leader.
At the moment, moderate voters seem to be coalescing behind Sir Keir Starmer in England and Nicola Sturgeon in Scotland. If the squeeze on the LibDems continues to the point where they appear to be a total irrelevance, it's not completely inconceivable that the SNP could build up a sustained polling advantage over them.
Naturally the other side of the equation is that the SNP would have to maintain a good level of support, although that bit is somewhat easier, because roughly 10% of lost vote share in Scotland translates into only 1% in Britain-wide polls.
READ MORE: BBC stands accused of ‘politicising’ coronavirus with new programme
Nevertheless, in the overall scheme of things it's not that long ago that the SNP were struggling to hold on to a slender lead in Scotland after the setback of the 2017 General Election, which meant that they were typically polling at only around 3% across the UK.
The fact that 6% is now even possible is testament to Nicola Sturgeon's total dominance of the current political scene in Scotland. Ironically, part of the reason that's happened is that the televised briefings on the pandemic have allowed her to overcome the aforementioned problem of the broadcasters failing to treat the SNP with the prominence they warrant as the UK's third party.
It's little wonder, then, that the Unionist parties, including the LibDems, have been so hellbent on persuading the BBC to either drop the briefings or to give punditry slots to other politicians.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel