ANN* thought Scotland was “crying out for teachers”, but just over a year after qualifying she is about to go onto Universal Credit after struggling to find work.
The 28-year-old decided to train as a primary school teacher following a BA degree in film studies and several years working in the childcare and nursery sector. She successfully completed a one-year postgraduate course at the University of Dundee in 2019 and spent a year as a probationary teacher at a primary school in Edinburgh.
“I loved my job, I had great feedback from the head teacher and I got on well with the children,” she told The National. “But since the end of the probationary year I have not been able to find work. I am now due to go onto Universal Credit.”
READ MORE: Teachers forced onto Universal Credit despite £75 million funding boost
Ann said in order to get a permanent job she put herself forward along with 300 applicants for a council-run recruitment process.
She described having a 30-minute interview in front of a two-person panel, neither of whom had worked with her or seen her teach in the classroom. In April she heard back that just eight of the 300 applicants were matched with vacancies, with 70 put on a reserve list and the remaining 222 applicants rejected.
She was one of the 222: “It was just at the beginning of lockdown and I was absolutely devastated. I took it really hard. I took it as a rejection of my skills as a teacher.
“With the distance of hindsight I don’t think that is true. The two people who interviewed me had never seen me teach in the classroom and had no concept of what I was like as a teacher. They were basing their decision on a 30-minute interview. What I don’t understand is if that is the employment situation. Why are colleges accepting so many people onto PGDE courses?”
Ann said she was given new hope when Education Secretary John Swinney announced in June that all probationary teachers would get a second year of guaranteed work because of the pandemic.
“I went into the summer feeling quite positive, thinking I had another year of work to look forward to even though I didn’t know which school I would be teaching in,” she said.
READ MORE: ‘I had to find extra work as a coronavirus contact tracer’
“However, we didn’t hear anything from Edinburgh Council, then we got an announcement that recruitment had stopped until we find out what John Swinney’s announcement means for the local authority and who is going to pay for it.
“I went all summer without hearing anything and then on the second-last day of the holidays, the council came back and said it couldn’t honour John Swinney’s promise. So they gave out jobs to the 70 or so people who were on the reserve list. That was another big blow.
“At that point I applied for Universal Credit. I am doing bits and pieces of supply work but because I’m on a zero-hours contract I have no security, and if we go into another lockdown all my work will disappear.
“I am now in a position where I will have to look at jobs outside teaching. I do a bit of babysitting and nanny work to make ends meet but it’s low-paid and the sort of work I was doing before I qualified. I didn’t expect finding a teaching job would be an easy ride but the last six months have been extremely difficult financially, and also to my mental health.
“There is a public impression that there’s a shortage of teachers in Scotland, but I don’t know where that is. I feel very let down by my experience.”
A council spokesperson said: “We don’t recognise the figures quoted. In line with guidance from the Scottish Government, our recruitment process is carried out openly and fairly, as budgets allow.”
* The teacher’s name has been changed as she wishes to remain anonymous.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel