DESPITE what the UK Government and some elements of the media assert, we are not facing a “refugee crisis”.
The numbers of people arriving in the UK before Covid-19 struck were less than in recent years. Between April and June this year, applications for asylum in the UK fell by 37% compared to the same time last year.
The Home Office themselves have admitted that around 98% of those crossing the Channel on small boats are in genuine need of protection. Nearly two-thirds of those who have applied for protection in 2019 were ultimately recognised as refugees. And, as the UN Refugee Agency advise, the UK is not at the epicentre of refugee arrivals globally or in Europe: in 2019 there were five asylum applications per 10,000 residents in the UK, putting the UK in the bottom half of the EU asylum table.
This is not a crisis.
Despite this truth, the Home Secretary, led it would seem by No10, appears hellbent on making people’s lives even more miserable once in the UK, and all during a global and worsening pandemic.
The politicians and “special advisors” that brief and leak headline grabbers, such as processing asylum claims on an island in the South Atlantic, on disused ferries, or on Scottish islands need to grow-up
Since the start of March, thousands of people have been routed like traffic into institutional accommodation – “hotels”, military barracks, “repurposed” detention centres – all indefinitely with no financial support.
Many vulnerable people face being rendered homeless by the Home Office within weeks and over winter, with little support and at acute risk to their safety. This is fettering local public health recoveries.
This week further outlandish and nonsensical proposals have been thrown around by the Home Secretary and No10, presumably to lay the ground for the Home Secretary’s speech at the Conservative party conference this Sunday.
The politicians and “special advisors” that brief and leak headline grabbers, such as processing asylum claims on an island in the South Atlantic, on disused ferries, or on Scottish islands need to grow-up and look at real-world solutions to the real-world issues of the UK asylum system.
READ MORE: Fury as detention centres for asylum seekers could be built on Scottish islands
A bit of empathy would help too. As indeed would respect for international law and the UK’s rightfully proud history of welcoming refugees.
It is not people seeking safety that is putting pressure on the Home Office. It is years of mismanagement and hostility across the asylum system, from the outsourcing of asylum accommodation to private contractors, to poor standards and persistently slow asylum decision making.
At the end of 2015 only 20% of people seeking asylum waited longer than 6 months for an initial decision, at the end of 2019, 56% were left in limbo for at least 6 months or longer.
The cause is a Home Office that is too often dysfunctional and detached from those in its jurisdiction, as the Windrush scandal tragically exposed.
It didn’t need to be like this. The coronavirus crisis could have been an opportunity for everyone with insecure status to be granted temporary leave to remain. Take the pressure off them, off the Home Office, and off the areas where refugees live, so we can pull together collectively.
The Home Office were rightly required in the public health drive to stop its “business as usual” evictions into destitution and inaccessibility to the asylum process itself. However, despite escalation of Covid-19 prevalence above lockdown levels, the Home Office has reverted to evicting people into homelessness and destitution.
We have already witnessed the worst extremes of the asylum system in Glasgow this summer. These remind us of the consequences of words and actions
Thi is leaving people in institutional accommodation indefinitely, and they are now touting offshore processing and regressive law change. This is deeply worrying and may mark a new low-point in the UK’s long and proud history of providing sanctuary to refugees.
As Scotland’s First Minister said this week, the Home Office must not treat people like cattle. We are all facing this pandemic together. The UK Government Ministers must dial down the rhetoric, act responsibly and focus on the real issues affecting the asylum system.
This means restarting and expanding the resettlement programme, quicker decisions on asylum cases, allowing people seeking asylum the right to work, commitments to help people rebuild their lives.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon slams Home Office plan to treat migrants like 'cattle'
These are some of the things that would make the system more compassionate, humane and effective. In Scotland, UK Government Ministers need to have grown-up conversations with the Scottish Government, local authorities and refugees to find sensible, safe and dignified solutions to accommodate people seeking asylum in communities.
We have already witnessed the worst extremes of the asylum system in Glasgow this summer. These remind us of the consequences of words and actions. The UK Government politicians and advisors should reflect and learn as what they dream up as ideas or even legislation will, if not thought through, harm thousands of lives.
We do not want institutional reception centres on Scottish islands. The people of Scotland want to help refugees, but never ever like this.
We are in a global pandemic. This is the real crisis. These are unknown and uncertain times for all of us.
When the Home Secretary takes to the stage on Sunday we want to hear grown-up solutions to the real-world problems facing refugees, the UK asylum system and the communities in which they live. The “out-of-the box” ideas we’ve heard this week should be put back in the box where they belong.
Chris Afuakwah is from the Scottish Refugee Council. You can get involved with their work here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel