ALLIANCE for Independence is no more, from now on they will be known as Action For Independence, in a bid to get past strict Electoral Commission rules.
Last month, the watchdog rejected their attempt to register as a political party, saying the name could confuse voters.
The Commission told AFI that their name gave the impression that they were “an alliance of some or all independence supporting parties”. They said: “It was our view that a voter was likely to consider this party to represent parties that it did not who share similar aims surrounding independence.”
They added: “A proposed name cannot be registered if, in our opinion, a voter is likely to be misled as to the effect of their vote.”
READ MORE: Do parties not understand how the Alliance for Independence will work?
Dave Thompson, the former SNP MSP and interim leader of the AFI, said these were “technical issues” which could “easily be sorted by minor changes to our constitution”. However, the Commission was not for budging.
The Alliance said that while they remained “convinced of their case” the only option left to them was a “costly and time consuming judicial review”.
Instead they have now re-applied to the Electoral Commission to change the name.
Thompson said: “We actually thought Alliance was self-explanatory, but the Electoral Commission didn’t share that view.
“We have no reason to think they’ll object to Action for Independence and, while we were disappointed with their first decision, we had to propose a new name in order to get us registered to stand in the Holyrood poll next year.
“I think Action for Independence is a good choice as ‘Action’ is a dynamic word and action for independence is something that many Yes supporters desperately want to see.”
So far only Tommy Sheridan’s Solidarity party has signed up to AFI. But Thompson has insisted others are interested.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel