PRITI Patel has been accused of failing to show compassion and "turning the clock back on 50 years of progress" after outlining plans to radically overhaul the UK's "broken" asylum system.
The Home Secretary accused "leftie lawyers" and her political critics of "defending the indefensible" as she set out ambitions in her speech to the virtual Conservative Party conference to "examine all practical measures to effectively deter illegal migration".
The speech has been criticised by Labour and a host of not-for-profit groups who called her policy shake-up "shameless" and "nonsensical".
It comes after ministers and officials faced a backlash last week over a string of reports on possible ideas for how to make changes to the asylum system, including processing those with claims on Ascension Island, some 4000 miles from the UK, and placing them on disused ferries in the sea.
READ MORE: Anger as Priti Patel hits out at 'do-gooders' as she pledges tougher asylum regime
At least 7000 migrants have managed to cross to the UK in small boats this year, according to analysis by the PA news agency.
Migrants crammed into unsafe dinghies have reached the UK from France on more than one in every three days, data shows.
Patel told the Tory conference: "After decades of inaction by successive governments we will address the moral, legal and practical problems with the asylum system.
"Because what exists now is neither firm nor fair.
"And I will bring forward legislation to deliver on that commitment next year.
"I will take every necessary step to fix this broken system, amounting to the biggest overhaul of our asylum system in decades.
"As for those defending the broken system - the traffickers, the do-gooders, the leftie lawyers, the Labour Party - they are defending the indefensible," she added.
But Labour said the Government was attempting to avoid blame for the current system, when it was the Tories who had been in power for the past 10 years.
Shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said: "The British people will see through the Home Secretary's shameless comments about a 'broken system', when the system has been overseen by the Tories for a decade.
"This is yet more evidence of how lacking in compassion and competence the Tories are."
Detention Action, a human rights group working with immigration detainees, said the proposals laid out by the Home Secretary showed a "contemptuous disregard" for the horror backstories of many of those making their way to Britain.
"Patel's proposals taken together would turn the clock back on over 50 years of progress on refugee protection - they are neither lawful, operationally workable, fair or compassionate," said a spokeswoman for the organisation.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson said Eat Out to Help Out saved millions of jobs, but was he right?
"They show a contemptuous disregard for survivors of torture and slavery and amount to shallow and cynical politicking, pure and simple."
Amnesty UK director Kate Allen called the plans "nonsensical" and called for more efforts to be made on "providing sanctuary".
Mike Adamson, chief executive of the British Red Cross, said: "Like the Home Secretary, we want to see a more compassionate asylum system.
"Huge backlogs in the processing of asylum claims mean many people are left in limbo, unable to work and living in destitution, for months, if not years.
"But this compassion needs to be applied to anyone arriving in the UK in search of safety.
"We should not judge how worthy someone is of asylum by how they arrived here, especially when the rules are so narrow."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel