FRONTING up to the nation every weekday has its pros and cons for Nicola Sturgeon.
On the plus side, the First Minister and her team of ministers, as well as health and police chiefs, are able to communicate the coronavirus strategy clearly at every stage.
On the other hand, she’s regularly reminded of what right-wing newspapers are writing about her down south.
Today, the First Minister was asked about an article in the Telegraph claiming she has waged a “highly effective psychological fear project against Scots” during the pandemic.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon Covid update: Scotland 'may well' face further restrictions
It’s written by Niall McCluskey, a criminal law and human rights advocate, and Christian McNeill, a former advocate and tribunal judge.
The article alleges “coronavirus regulations now control and restrict every area of our lives and are subject to no scrutiny by the Scottish Parliament”.
They add: “Far from being informed by ‘the science’ government policy seems to be informed by a small group of people who are stuck in an echo chamber, and appear to be using limited evidence.
“Voices of dissent, even distinguished academics, are sidelined and even blocked on social media channels.
“Anyone attempting to question or present an alternative evidence based view is mischaracterised as selfish, as putting the economy before lives, or as a crazed conspiracy theorist.”
READ MORE: Covid in Scotland: Nicola Sturgeon confirms another 697 cases
They speculate: “The question arises, why would the government do this? The answer might be that having conducted a highly effective psychological fear project against the population, restrictions are really popular.”
These points were put to Sturgeon, aka Big Brother in the Telegraph’s eyes, during today’s coronavirus briefing.
It’s fair to say she wasn’t too phased by the claims, giving a rather more convincing summation of what’s really going on in Scotland.
Watch her full response here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel