FROM the moment Finance Secretary Kate Forbes stepped in at the last minute to present the Scottish Budget, she’s been confounding some people’s expectations.
The Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch MSP is generally considered to have taken to the role impressively, especially considering she’s had to deal with a pandemic and an uncooperative UK Government.
But as ever, the Tories are holding the Scottish minister to their ultra-high standards – which they mysteriously fail to apply to themselves.
READ MORE: UK Budget delay could cause ‘billions of pounds’ worth of uncertainty
Forbes has often had to contend with patronising contempt from her critics, as exhibited today at of the Finance and Constitution Committee.
She was questioned by Conservative MSP Alexander Burnett, who raised concerns about employment and Scotland’s tax base. He asked the Finance Secretary why the Fair Start Scotland scheme is “not working”.
That assertion was rejected by Forbes, who also explained the route cause of all the issues raised by Burnett – his Tory bosses in Westminster.
Moving onto business rates, the Tory MSP was kind enough to “totally acknowledge” the Finance Secretary’s supposed “lack of business experience”.
READ MORE: Holyrood not consulted over UK's 'astonishing' cancellation of tourist VAT scheme
Forbes, evidently weary of such contempt from her detractors, replied: “Well, I can only thank you for sharing your own business experience and enlightening me.”
She pointed out the real problem with Scotland’s finances: “Because your government can’t get its act together and provide clarity on next year’s budget, it means we are left in the position of not knowing whether or not we can extend the rates relief.”
It wasn't just Forbes who noted Burnett's tone, with Twitter users quick to criticise his "patronising mansplaining".
Good to see @KateForbesMSP taking none of Alexander Burnett’s patronising mansplaining at committee this morning. pic.twitter.com/0NYsHwSg4k
— Fergus Mutch (@Fergoodness) October 7, 2020
Let's just hope the Tories learn their lesson ... we're not holding our breath.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel