LIZ Truss has vowed to “undermine” farmers in any trade deal the UK Government strikes after Brexit.
The International Trade Secretary’s gaffe came during a Commons debate on farming standards, amid warnings about chlorinated chicken and hormone-injected beef being introduced to supermarket shelves.
Labour’s shadow trade secretary, Emily Thornberry, probed the Tory minister over the potential import of lower-standard US produce.
She said: “There is no import ban against pork produced on farms using sow stalls because, as [Truss] said, it’s an issue of animal welfare not one of food safety. That means, if the Government drops tariffs on US pork, British pork farmers will be undercut by cheap imports from American agricultural companies using practices that have been banned in our country for the last 21 years.
“So will the Secretary of State listen to reason and write into the law the protection of all UK farming standards against imports that don’t meet them?”
Truss, however, muddled her words in her seemingly self-assured response.
She replied: “In any trade deal we strike, we will be taking into account our high standards to make sure our farmers are undermined.”
READ MORE: Anger as UK's trade talks with Japan halt over Liz Truss's love of stilton
LibDem MP Alistair Carmichael picked up on the International Trade Secretary’s gaffe later in the debate.
“I can see why she wouldn’t agree to meet with Save British Farming at their demonstration on Monday when I asked,” the Orkney and Shetland representative commented.
The House of Lords last month amended the Agriculture Bill in a bid to block the import of foodstuffs produced abroad at lower animal welfare standards, amid warnings over chlorinated chicken or hormone-treated beef entering the UK market from the US.
The Government is expected to overturn the amendment in the Commons, and has consistently argued existing protections are already in place and they have no intention of watering them down.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel