THIS is how the Westminster political bubble operates. This is not new.
But every once in a while there’s tangible evidence that something isn’t quite right in the system that you can point to and say: Told you so.
Last night four of the country’s most senior journalists posted nearly identical tweets from an unnamed UK Government source slagging off Keir Starmer.
Now listen folks – we’re a pro-independence paper. We’re not too concerned about Tories getting stuck into the Labour leader. But let us explain the issue here.
Within a half an hour window, BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg, Sky News political editor Beth Rigby, former Sun political editor Tom Newton Dunn and his successor Harry Cole all tweeted the same quote from a “senior govt source”.
READ MORE: WATCH: DWP Secretary can't say if she could live on £5.84 furlough wage
The quote itself was nothing special. The source said: ““Keir Starmer is a shameless opportunist playing political games in the middle of a global pandemic. He says he wants a national lockdown but he’s refusing to back targeted restrictions in areas that need them most.”
But in the Westminster bubble journalists jump to put out these highly politicised messages without attributing them to anyone.
At Ross McCafferty eloquently put it: “Cummings' group texts working then.”
Cummings' group texts working then. pic.twitter.com/NvIww6ZUUt
— Ross McCafferty (@RossMcCaff) October 13, 2020
It happens all the time. In the immediate aftermath of the Dominic Cummings lockdown scandal, Kuenssberg was publicly tweeting the Mirror journalist who broke the story to inform her an unnamed UK Government source believed they had their details wrong.
There’s never anyone named so nobody can ever be held accountable – if the information is wrong it doesn’t matter because no individual can be criticised.
The unchecked repetition of unnamed senior Tories makes these reporters more like party press officers by the day.
The Conservatives dominate the media and their agenda always comes out on top – and the UK’s most senior journalists seem only too happy to keep it that way.
Have you gone from No to Yes since 2014? Send us in a picture!
Support for independence is now at 58%! To mark the occasion, we want to find 58 photographs of people who've gone From No to Yes since the indyref in 2014 for a special feature in this weekend's Sunday National. Share a picture of yourself and why you now back independence with us now!
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel