SCOTLAND’S trade union movement is poised to officially back a second independence referendum when the STUC put the issue to a vote at its annual congress next month.
A 14-page strategy document, leaked to the Sunday National, has been drawn up and approved by the organisation’s general council for the event and covers three areas – the pandemic crisis and its impact on workers, economic recovery and “a Scotland Fit for the Future”.
Within the third section, the paper sets out its position on self-determination arguing the case for a new referendum is “unanswerable” if “there is evidence of a majority in support of independence” and if the new 2021 Parliament holds a majority of members in favour of a second referendum.
“The STUC has always held to the principle of self-determination for the people of Scotland. We cannot pre-ordain the outcome of the necessary democratic processes to give self-determination effect, but the Scottish people are sovereign,” it says.
The paper then goes on to underline its concerns over the UK Government’s intention to increase direct spending in Scotland, which the paper argues is a part of wider attempts to weaken the devolution settlement in the post-Brexit era, which it believes would have a negative impact on the lives of Scottish workers.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour 'can't find candidates' for 2021 Holyrood election
“Public services desperately require more funding, but the intention of the UK Government to increase direct spending in Scotland in areas of devolved competency is a clear attempt to weaken the devolution settlement,” it says.
“We will oppose any moves which reduce the powers of the Parliament as well as campaigning for the extension of devolution in agreed areas such as employment law, equalities and aspects of immigration.
“The Single Market Act threatens Scottish devolution through overriding our Parliament’s agency over state aid, procurement, environmental protection and food standards.”
It adds: “”These are key powers with the potential to change the lives of working- class people for the better. Without these powers, fair work and a plan for jobs in transport and renewables will be harder to achieve.
“Alongside motions on climate change and industrial democracy, the greatest number of motions submitted to the postponed Congress were on the subject of self-determination.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer insists Richard Leonard can become first minister next year
“If, come May 2021, there is evidence of a majority in support of independence and if the new Parliament holds a majority of members in favour of a second referendum, the case for a further poll will become unanswerable.”
The paper concludes it is unlikely the STUC will favour either a Yes or No position, but said it would “engage actively” in any future campaign.
“Whilst it is difficult at this point to imagine the trade union movement in Scotland emerging with a consensus for a particular option in a future referendum, we will engage actively in the constitutional debate based on the interests of working-class people.
“The ultimate test for the proponents of all options is their commitment to radical economic and social change. No-one in Scotland can afford to wait for the outcome of a future referendum, rebuilding the economy and the people’s recovery must begin now.”
A union insider said the STUC’s position would heap pressure on Richard Leonard to reverse Labour’s opposition to a new vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel