THE “gender gap” in support for independence is disappearing in recent polls, according to Professor Sir John Curtice.
The elections expert said studies from 2014 found men were much more likely to vote Yes than women, who supported No to a larger degree.
Curtice said recent polls found this gap has shrunk or vanished altogether, while a number of pollsters have found support for independence has risen above 50%.
He published a blog post analysing the recent polling on Scottish independence on the What Scotland Thinks website yesterday. The academic cautioned against reading too much into the recent Ipsos Mori poll, which put support for Yes at 58%, as another poll by Savanta ComRes put Yes support at 53%.
He said: “The fact that we have had two polls whose fieldwork dates overlap, one pointing to a further increase in support for independence and one not, means that at this stage at least we have to reserve judgment on whether there has been a further increase on the modest lead for Yes that has been consistently reported by the polls since June.
“This is particularly the case given that Ipsos Mori’s poll was their first of this year and thus we have no previous reading from the coronavirus era with which to compare their latest reading.
“What we can say on the basis of the two polls is that there continues to be a sustained lead for Yes – it is now nine polls in a row that have put Yes ahead.”
The professor said a demographic feature worth noting is the disappearance of the “gender gap”.
He said: “It may, perhaps, even be the case that a narrow majority of men voted Yes in 2014 and either way the No victory appeared to rest heavily on the support of women – who perhaps were more averse to what they considered to be the risks of independence.
“Now, the picture appears to be rather different. On average the last nine polls have put support for Yes at 54%. These same nine polls on average put the figure for both men and women at 54% too.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel