THE SNP's treasurer emailed donors yesterday in a bid to “quash rumours” that money supposedly ringfenced for indyref2 has already been spent.
But one of the party’s own MPs told The National there was still “huge questions to answer”.
It came after the Electoral Commission published the financial accounts for the UK’s larger political parties – those with an income or expenditure of more than £250,000.
The SNP’s paperwork reveals that they took in £5,290,815 and spent £5,609,024 in 2019, leaving them with just under £96,854 in the bank.
That’s despite two major fundraising drives for an indyref2 fighting fund in recent years.
A 2017 push saw the party take in £482,000 on their ref.scot website.
Indy supporters also put their hands in their pockets more recently after a call for donations on the SNP-owned Yes.scot page.
Yesterday morning, after speculation on the Wings Over Scotland blog, the SNP’s treasurer Colin Beattie wrote to party donors to say that money raised for indyref2 was being held in a “Referendum Appeal Fund”.
He said there was £593,501 ready to be deployed “instantaneously”.
Beattie said: “I felt it was important for me to get in touch today to quash rumours spreading on social media about one of our fundraising appeals.”
Beattie insisted the funds “remain earmarked for the referendum and are ready to be fully deployed at a moment’s notice”.
He added: “Like all other political parties, the SNP does not separate out restricted funds in annual accounts. Any such donations are woven through the overall income figures each year.
“The Referendum Appeal Fund has a current balance of £593,501 and we can fully deploy those funds instantaneously – guaranteeing maximum impact when vital funds are needed most.
“I’ll leave our opponents to the social media conspiracies, but I wanted you to get the facts direct from me.”
Former justice secretary Kenny MacAskill wasn’t convinced. He also questioned why, according to the accounts, the party had spent £156,483 on legal fees last year, up from £38,676 in 2018. “There’s still huge questions to answer,” he said.
“Why is it the accounts are only coming out now, and only coming through the Electoral Commission?
“They’re not particularly good and they do leave many questions to answer.”
The East Lothian MP added: “Trust has been lost at HQ. And this is not helping to clarify it.
“This is creating more questions than it’s answering. The accounts should be clear.
“People shouldn’t be having to ask. The treasurer shouldn’t be having to put out an explanatory note.”
Stuart Campbell from Wings Over Scotland said the response was “deeply unconvincing”.
“All the supposedly ring-fenced donations came from two appeal websites, so why would the money be scattered randomly through the accounts? If the SNP claims to know to the last pound how much this ‘Referendum Appeal Fund’ is, why not simply identify it as such in the accounts?”
He added: “And if there’s nearly £600,000 available to be spent ‘at a moment’s notice’, why are the SNP’s total net current assets less than half that?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel