LABOUR is on the brink of a new civil war after Keir Starmer suspended Jeremy Corbyn for claiming the party’s antisemitism problem had been “dramatically overstated for political reasons”.
The former leader’s comments came after the publication of a damning report by the Equality and Human Rights Commission which said the party was “responsible for unlawful acts of harassment and discrimination”.
The equalities watchdog identified what it called “serious failings in the Labour Party leadership in addressing antisemitism and an inadequate process for handling antisemitism complaints”.
The body found the party had breached the Equality Act 2010 by interfering in antisemitism complaints, including instances of inappropriate involvement by the leader of the opposition’s office.
Asked for his response, the former party boss said the “problem was dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party”.
He also said that he did not accept all the findings of the EHRC report.
Corbyn said: “One antisemite is one too many, but the scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media. That combination hurt Jewish people and must never be repeated.”
Starmer said his predecessor’s comments meant the party had little choice.
“I made it clear that we would not support antisemitism or the denial of antisemitism through the suggestion that it is exaggerated or factional and that is why I was disappointed by Jeremy Corbyn’s response and that is why appropriate action has been taken, which I fully support,” he said in a broadcast interview.
The veteran left-winger promised to fight the suspension, calling it political.
READ MORE: John McDonnell: Suspending Jeremy Corbyn from Labour 'profoundly wrong'
Meanwhile in Scotland, Richard Leonard, who last year urged Scots to help put Corbyn in Number 10, declined to speak out.
In a statement released before Corbyn was suspended, the Scottish party boss said: “This report will be a saddening and sobering read for everyone in the Labour party and everyone who is committed to eliminating antisemitism, racism and hatred from our society.
“It sets out a series of failures which are a matter of deep regret, for me and for everyone in our party. Keir Starmer has made crystal clear this morning that our party will accept the report’s findings and implement its recommendations in full, and that is the right thing to do.
“All of us have a duty to root out antisemitism wherever it exists, and that doesn’t stop at this report – we need to remain vigilant against the evil of antisemitism in our society.
“We must work tirelessly with the Jewish community to rebuild trust. We also have a responsibility to further educate our members and society at large on antisemitism and how to fight it.”
Asked if he agreed with the suspension of Corbyn, he said: “I have known Jeremy Corbyn for decades. He is a life-long anti-racist campaigner. But I am not commenting on internal disciplinary matters.”
Tory MSP Oliver Mundell criticised Leonard’s failure to condemn Corbyn.
He said: “Richard Leonard stood by as Jeremy Corbyn let down the Jewish community and allowed antisemitism to run rife in his party. He still won’t stand up and criticise the mistakes of his fallen idol.
“It shouldn’t be hard to send a clear message that overlooking antisemitism is wrong. If Keir Starmer can condemn Jeremy Corbyn’s flawed and deeply damaging leadership, why won’t Richard Leonard do the same?
“Defending Jeremy Corbyn shows just how out of touch Richard Leonard is with people across Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel