SCOTTISH beavers are being shipped to England as part of a “bizarre” trade sanctioned by the public body responsible for Scotland's natural heritage, the Greens have claimed.
NatureScot is planning to move some of the animals south of the border to different conservation projects. They say that it's about avoiding the use of "lethal control".
Under current legislation beavers are a protected species, though farmers and landowners can apply for licenses to kill them if they're building dams which threaten to flood fields.
In 2019, 87 beavers were shot between 1 May 2019, when they gained protected status from the Scottish Government, and 31 December 2019.
At least ten of the animals were kits, less than a year old. That prompted concerns from the members of the Scottish Beaver Forum.
NatureScot say that concern has led to them “putting even greater” into trapping the animals for “translocation”.
Between 25 August and 5 September this year, 16 beavers have been trapped in Tayside.
One animal was re-released locally, while another 11 have been released at five different projects in England. A further four animals are currently at a holding facility until trapping of the family group is complete
In a parliamentary answer to Scottish Green MSP Mark Ruskell, the Environment Secretary, Roseanna Cunningham revealed that 16 other projects in England had requested a total of 112 beavers from Scotland.
The Greens described it as a "bizarre illicit beaver trade."
Ruskell said the sheer number involved was alarming. The last Scottish beaver survey estimated there were about 433 beavers in Tayside in 114 territories.
He said: “While exile is better than execution, this bizarre situation is what happens when a government wants to simultaneously protect and eradicate an animal from our country.
“The fact is there are farmers and nature reserves in Scotland who would welcome beaver populations. Instead we are exporting these creatures en masse. Beavers are native to Scotland, we should be translocating them across the country so we can build a healthy population here.
"Translocated beavers could bring eco-tourism to new areas of Scotland, while restoring the nature rich wetlands we need to protect against floods. Beavers are nature’s expert engineers, they are needed at home in Scotland and shouldn’t be shot or shipped to England.”
A NatureScot spokesperson said: “We continue to work with partners on a range of measures – including mitigation, trapping and translocation - to lessen the impact beavers are having and reduce the need for control measures.
“In 2019, 19 beavers were trapped and translocated to Knapdale and England. This year, in response to concerns expressed by some members of the Scottish Beaver Forum and others regarding the level of lethal control of beavers in 2019, we are putting even greater effort into trapping animals for translocation and moving them to conservation projects in England.
“The quoted figure of 112 is incorrect. Since trapping started in August a total of 15 beavers have been successfully trapped and translocated.
“We continue to look into opportunities for conservation translocations within and on the edge of beavers’ existing range in the Tay and Forth catchments. These must be carefully planned, and local stakeholders consulted, as part of the Scottish Code for Conservation Translocations.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel