THE TORIES have seemingly ruled out a second independence referendum for another “25 or 40” years.
Secretary of State for Scotland, Alister Jack, made the comments in an interview with the BBC yesterday.
He made clear the UK Government would refuse any request for a Section 30 order “for a generation”.
Nicola Sturgeon compared it to Donald Trump’s refusal to accept Joe Biden’s victory as president.
When asked if ministers were ruling out a referendum for the full term of the next Scottish Parliament, even if a pro-independence majority was returned, Jack said “it’s no for a generation”.
Asked to define a generation, he said: “Is it 25 years or is it 40 years? You tell me.
“But it’s certainly not six years, nor 10."
Jack added: “It’s very clear that it’s no because a generation hasn’t passed.
“We’ve had two referenda in the last six years and they’ve been quite divisive for our society. They create quite a lot of uncertainty for business. What we need to do now is refocus on building our economy and give business certainty.
“That creates more jobs. That improves people’s livelihoods."
READ MORE: Brexit: Boris Johnson to hold talks with EU president in wake of Joe Biden win
Responding to the interview on social media, the First Minister tweeted: “As we’re seeing across the Atlantic just now, politicians who rage against democracy don’t prevail. Let’s not dignify this rubbish.
“Instead let’s keep making and winning the case for independence. Power doesn’t belong to politicians – it belongs to the people. #indyref2.”
Asked if the comments were government policy, Boris Johnson’s spokesman later said: “The PM has said on countless occasions that the issue of independence was settled when the Scottish people voted decisively to remain part of the UK.
“It was billed at the time as a once-in-a-generation vote and the Prime Minister has been clear that he believes that must be respected.”
Asked if Johnson would agree that a “generation” would be between 25 and 40 years, the spokesman said: “The fact is that people voted to keep our United Kingdom together. It was billed at the time as a once-in-a-generation vote.”
The SNP’s shadow Scotland secretary Mhairi Black said the Tory position was “completely unsustainable, undemocratic and doomed to fail”.
She also pointed out that Jack had contradicted himself.
In 2019 he had agreed with Ruth Davidson that the SNP winning a majority at the next Holyrood election would be a mandate for a Section 30 order.
He said: “Because the democratic mandate for a Section 30 order is a matter for 2021. We’ll see whether or not the Scottish National Party get a majority then.
“I mean the Scottish National Party – not in collaboration with other parties, not in any alliances – but a Scottish National Party majority”.
Black said: “Just as Donald Trump will have to accept the will of the people if the US election goes against him, so will Boris Johnson has to accept the will of the people of Scotland in next year’s Holyrood election.
“With poll after poll concluding that independence is now becoming the settled will of the majority of people in Scotland, it’s telling that Alister Jack is shamelessly shifting the goalposts given his previous contradictory comments over a second referendum – the Tories are rattled.
Jack’s comments echoed similar ones made by former leader Jackson Carlaw last year.
Speaking at the Scottish Tory manifesto launch, he ruled out indyref2 until at least 2054.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel