THE SNP will next week launch a major document highlighting the shortcomings of the UK Government’s Integrated Review (IR) of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy.
The report is due for public release on Tuesday and gives a detailed insight into the party’s approach toward issues, most of which remain reserved. Entitled “SNP Submission to the Integrated Review”, it argues that “the foreign and defence interests of Scotland have been long ignored by the UK Government”.
The submission identifies three key aspects with which the review offers the UK Government the chance to re-evaluate what security and defence means, including a more effective Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), a Resilient State and a modern armed forces.
In focusing its concerns, the SNP called for the creation of a FCDO capable of what it describes as “coherent policymaking that protects Scottish interests and is able to project our values abroad”.
Among the many issues addressed are upholding and protecting human rights, climate justice and Scotland’s relations with its Nordic neighbours.
Above all, it concentrates on what it identifies as the UK Government’s policymaking failure to “reflect the United Kingdom’s constitutional frameworks”.
It was the UK Government’s decision to postpone its planned multi-year comprehensive spending review (CSR) that has raised concerns about the implications for the Integrated Review.
Critics accuse the Tory Government of leaving policymaking in limbo and say that four years on from the decision to leave the EU, it has yet to clearly outline how it sees the UK’s role in the world once Brexit is completed.
Taking on board Scotland-specific concerns, the SNP’s submission document will only add to the pressure but is also being viewed as an insight into the extent to which the Scottish Government’s approach to such issues stand in marked contrast to that of its UK counterparts.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel