NOTHING conveys confidence in the future of the, er, Union, than a Prime Minister who, er, can barely spit out a sentence saying that, er, the Scottish people would almost certainly vote No if given the chance to vote in an independence referendum again.
Of course this is a chance we won’t have if he gets his way, but that doesn’t matter because “almost certainly” is good enough, isn’t it? We should probably just stop having elections too, if it seems “almost certain” who will win them. Devolution and democracy are all well and good if people use them in the correct way – for example, to elect Boris Johnson as mayor of London – but a disaster if they make the wrong choices. The solution, therefore, is to avoid giving them choices.
We don’t know what tedious ramble was set to follow this, because by this point Speaker Lindsay Hoyle had become fed up listening to the umms and errs of the man who – week in, week out – has refused to refer to the SNP by their actual name, then simply served up further cheek after finally being corrected on it.
Keir Starmer had wanted to know why the Prime Minister referred to devolution north of the Border as a disaster, and why he was so hell-bent on putting the Union in jeopardy with his steady stream of ignorant comments and deliberate insults. Naturally Johnson replied with more of the same, listing the many ways in which the “Scottish Nationalist Party” had failed to improve the lives of Scots.
The Speaker – finally! – had had enough. “Could I just say, it’s the Scottish National Party, not the nationalist party” he said, to which the petulant PM replied “I’m so sorry – they’re national but not nationalists – I see, right” before smirking to himself. His card was marked, so it wasn’t a huge surprise that when he later began yet another diatribe against the party, Hoyle cut him off.
READ MORE: WATCH: Boris Johnson scolded by Speaker for getting SNP's name wrong
This was easy enough for him to do given the PM was self-isolating and taking part digitally, but will he have the confidence to tell him to sit down and shut up when he’s back in the chamber? Here’s hoping. Will Johnson abide by the “ruling”, as he erroneously described it, that he isn’t allowed to call his opponents by names he’s made up, or will his opponents have to resort to calling him Doris Gym-stain before he gets the message? Doubtless he will do it again and claim it was an innocent mistake.
Does he really think we’re all stupid? He also claims there’s been nothing untoward about the way in which contracts have been handed out during the pandemic, despite Starmer pointing out that suppliers with political connections were 10 times more likely to secure them. Thank goodness the Leader of the Opposition has woken up to the fact that this wasn’t a case of Johnson and co being careless with public money. On the contrary, they have been very carefully directing it towards their cronies, freed from the usual restraints of a competitive tendering process.
Ah, says Johnson, but Labour were opposed to buying up PPE when the UK had a desperate need for it, and now “Captain Hindsight is once again trying to score party political points”. How foolish of Labour not to specify, while supporting the calls to protect frontline workers, that the situation shouldn’t be used for shameless profiteering. Colonel Corruption can hardly be blamed now, can he?
Perhaps next week the Speaker will put an end to the childish name-calling altogether. We can dream.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel