IAN Blackford took apart Spector editor Fraser Nelson’s attack on the Scottish Government during last night’s Question Time, accusing him of a “gross distortion of the truth”.
In what came as a surprise to absolutely nobody, the SNP Westminster leader was the only pro-independence voice on the BBC programme’s panel and faced the usual SNP-Bad attacks from the Unionists present.
Tory minister James Cleverly, whose bizarre attempts to rewrite history in his defence of Boris Johnson’s devolution “disaster” comments saw even Fiona Bruce take a critical tone with him, and Nelson were desperate to bash the SNP during the episode, which was broadcast from Windsor.
The pair were quick to spin Johnson’s claim that devolution was Tony Blair’s “biggest mistake” as evidence that it’s the democratically elected SNP who are bad, actually.
(This is now the agreed Tory line on what the PM said – if you don’t believe us, take a look in Wales where the Welsh Tory leader is claiming it’s the Welsh Labour-led governments which have been the “disaster”. Hmm.)
During the panel discussion on Johnson’s controversial comment, Nelson called it “daft” but said he sympathised with the viewpoint.
“When I backed devolution 20 years ago I thought it would be very different to what it turned out to be,” he claimed. “Sure Scotland’s got world-class climate legislation but it’s also got some of the worst poverty and deprivation in Western Europe. The life expectancy in some parts of Glasgow is less than it is in Rwanda and it’s shocking.”
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Andrew Neil claim male longevity in Glasgow like sub-Saharan Africa
Nelson claimed he believed before the devolution referendum that a Scottish Parliament would mean more resources are put into addressing poverty, but complained energy has instead gone “instead into talking about the constitution, about an independence referendum, about having another fight with Westminster”.
He told viewers: “It’s pretty difficult to blame Westminster for things that are entirely in the control of the Scottish Parliament.”
But Blackford was armed with the facts. “It’s only the last few years that we’ve had some responsibility for social security.
“We’ve been praised by the United Nations for our approach to poverty, we’ve introduced eight different measures, four of them entirely new – and for example what we’ve done in terms of the £10 allowance for young people which will drive young people out of poverty.
“And actually, life expectancy in Scotland has increased over the lifetime of the parliament. There’s been a greater increase in life expectancy in London but if you look at the rest of the UK the increasing life expectancy in Scotland has actually been higher than it has in the rest of the United Kingdom.
“So I’m afraid to say that what you’re saying is actually a gross distortion of the truth.”
He added that there has been an improvement in the attainment of young people coming from the most deprived areas.
Isn’t it interesting how right-wing Unionists are happy to watch the Tories drive forward an austerity agenda for 10 years, resulting in increased food bank use and poverty levels, but are the first in the queue to shout down the Scottish Government when it comes to poverty-related issues?
Online, people were furious with Nelson's comments.
.@frasernelson on #bbcqt comes out with his usual line that "life expectancy in some parts of Glasgow is lower than Rwanda." This is untrue, a cliche & not helpful to anyone. Is Nelson & the right-wing @spectator in favour of more redistribution & social justice?
— Gerry Hassan (@GerryHassan) November 19, 2020
Commentator Gerry Hassan wrote that the editor had come out "with his usual line that 'life expectancy in some parts of Glasgow is lower than Rwanda.' This is untrue, a cliche & not helpful to anyone. Is Nelson & the right-wing @spectator in favour of more redistribution & social justice?"
Tom French added: "Bizarre rant from @FraserNelson. Criticises poverty in Scotland but completely ignores the fact that the biggest drivers of poverty over the past decade have been Tory austerity cuts, punitive welfare reforms, and Brexit - all of which Scotland and the SNP opposed."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel