TRANSPARENCY isn’t the first word that springs to mind when you think of the UK Government.
Dominic Cummings may have gone but it’s still hard to get an honest answer from Tory ministers. We probably shouldn’t be too surprised, given the Prime Minister won’t admit how many children he has.
But the Treasury has taken secrecy to a whole new level.
Yesterday, it issued advanced copies of the Chancellor’s Spending Review before he announced it in the Commons – as is standard practice.
But nothing is ever as straight forward as it seems with this government, as highlighted by Alison Thewliss.
The SNP MP shared what she had been sent by the Treasury – effectively nothing.
The advance copy of the Chancellor's Spending Review has arrived - earlier than usual, but just as redacted... 🤦 #SpendingReview pic.twitter.com/WoUCtmQ5tJ
— Alison Thewliss (@alisonthewliss) November 25, 2020
That’s because virtually every line of the document had been redacted. It’s understood all opposition MPs received the same ultra-useful document.
A Treasury spokesperson told The National: "There is nothing unusual about opposition parties receiving redacted copies of statements or related documents ahead of time. Redactions are made to protect sensitive or market sensitive information and these advance copies are shared with all of the opposition parties in the House of Commons.”
READ MORE: Alister Jack refuses to resign over foreign aid cut despite concerns
It’s fair to say Thewliss was less than impressed when Rishi Sunak’s economic plans were eventually revealed in the Commons.
The Glasgow MP noted that the Government was freezing public sector workers’ pay and cutting international aid funding, while also committing tens of millions of pounds to a celebration to mark the UK’s withdrawal from the EU.
“£29m for a festival of Brexit while weans go hungry at home and abroad just about sums this tawdry government up.”
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak slammed for 'tawdry priorities' after £29m Brexit festival splurge
But the SNP politician wasn’t finished with the Chancellor.
She again took aim at Sunak when he invited the public to ask him questions about the Spending Review on social media.
Dear @RishiSunak,
— Alison Thewliss (@alisonthewliss) November 26, 2020
⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛?"
#⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ https://t.co/NaOPItJn0s
Bravo, Alison Thewliss.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel