ENVIRONMENTAL groups have welcomed a Scottish Government decision to require grouse shooting licences, but gamekeeper groups have complained of an "endless battering" of rural life.
Rural affairs minister Mairi Gougeon said the proposed requirement for grouse shooting businesses to be licensed is an attempt to curb "illegal raptor persecution".
In a statement to the Scottish Parliament, Gougeon acknowledged the measures "will not be welcomed by everyone" but that action had to be taken to stop the mysterious killing and disappearance of birds of prey near grouse moors.
Reacting to the announcement, Scottish Gamekeepers Association chairman Alex Hogg said: "This decision will anger our community. It will not be easily forgotten. Our members have effectively had targets painted on their backs, today."
He claimed that those who campaigned for licensing "have no interest in seeing it being a success" and instead want to use it "to agitate for a full ban".
Hogg added: "I am angry beyond expression at the way a community of working people is being treated today in this country and the strain they and their families are constantly having to face as they cope with never-ending scrutiny and inquiry, driven by elite charities with big influence over politicians and axes to grind against a people who produce so much for Scotland yet ask little back."
Revive - an umbrella organisation for grouse moor reform in Scotland, made up of charities such as OneKind, Friends of the Earth Scotland, League Against Cruel Sports and Raptor Persecution UK - welcomed the plan.
Campaign manager Max Wiszniewski said: "We are encouraged by some of what we have heard from the Scottish Government and welcome proposals to address the severe damage caused by grouse moor management.
"Scotland's grouse moors are barren landscapes devoid of the majority of naturally occurring flora and fauna, surrounded by a circle of destruction intended to wipe out anything which pose a threat to red grouse, which are effectively farmed to be shot for entertainment."
READ MORE: Why the SNP should back an end to grouse shooting on Scottish moors
Writing for The National this month, Wiszniewski said that "for all the land grouse moors use up, they only contribute 0.02% to our overall economy".
The Scottish Conservatives' environment spokesperson Liz Smith said the decision was "another SNP attack on rural Scotland which will have deeply damaging and long-lasting consequences".
She criticised ministers for not waiting five years - as suggested by a grouse moor management study - to introduce a license scheme if there were no improvements.
Scottish Greens environment spokesperson Mark Ruskell was critical that a consultation on the plans will involve gamekeeper and shooting organisations but no environmental groups were mentioned.
He said: "It's very disappointing that after 150 years of wildlife being mass killed on Scottish moors, delays to the watered-down Werrity report and the Scottish Government dragging its heels for another year, all we have is a consultation on licencing which will be drawn up by the industry."
Scottish LibDem MSP Liam McArthur said: "Scottish Liberal Democrats have been calling for a licensing scheme and this is a positive step in that direction.
"There needs to be a better balance in the interests of animal welfare, the environment and biodiversity. But a scheme can protect responsible operators too."
Scottish Labour's Claudia Beamish said: "The persecution of wildlife and the illegal shooting of raptors to preserve only grouse for sport must stop and will require additional resourcing for proper enforcement.
"Scottish Labour is not against shooting in the countryside by local residents with appropriate gun licenses, shooting for the pot or commercial enterprises for sport, but a robust licensing system must to be introduced immediately to regulate driven grouse moors."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel