ALISTER Jack has said he will “certainly not” resign over the Conservative Government’s plan to cut foreign aid despite his concerns.
The Scottish Secretary said he didn’t want ministers to decrease international aid budget by £4 billion – breaking a manifesto promise opposed to a cut – as it was a “terribly important” policy.
However, the Dumfries MP told BBC Radio Scotland yesterday morning that he would not be leaving the government in protest like fellow Tory minister Baroness Liz Sugg.
“I think overseas aid from the wealthier nations is terribly important, but I’m certainly not going to resign over it,” he said.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced international aid expenditure would be cut from 0.7 to 0.5% of UK GDP when he set out his spending review for next year on Wednesday.
He said the current level of spending would be difficult to justify to the public as the national debt continued to soar amidst the worst economic crisis in 300 years.
It prompted Baroness Sugg to resign as a Foreign Office minister, calling the decision “fundamentally wrong”, while a series of backbench Tory MPs condemned the move. Three former prime ministers called for the change to be dropped, including David Cameron, who enshrined the 0.7% target in law in 2015.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the move, which was also attacked by church leaders and charities, was “deplorable” and pandering to the right-wing of the Tory party.
Asked about the criticism, Jack said: “I would rather overseas aid had stayed at 0.7%. I think that goes without saying, because it is in law and it was a commitment.
“But we are facing unprecedented times and challenges. We’ve reduced it to 0.5%. That’s still £10bn. We’ve protected the girls in education policy within that money.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak slammed for ‘deplorable’ cut to aid that may cause ‘100,000 deaths’
“But we are still second in the G7 for overseas aid. I think only Germany are ahead of us. We’re still more than pulling our weight.
“Hopefully when our economy recovers we’ll be able to raise the figure back to 0.7%.”
Asked if he would follow Baroness Sugg and resign from his position given he was “clearly unhappy about this cut”, Jack said: “It’s not that I’m not happy. I recognise that it has to be done.
“I would prefer we are at 0.7% because I think overseas aid from the wealthier nations is terribly important, but I’m certainly not going to resign over it.
“I recognise we have a global pandemic and we have borrowing the likes of which we haven’t seen since the Second World War, so we have to take tough decisions.”
He said 0.5% was still a “very good and credible figure” and denied it was politically driven.
He said: “I think it’s being responsible and look after people at home, prioritising our people at home who are going into economic hardship.”
Despite the Tory general election manifesto promising not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, Jack said tax hikes could not be ruled out to cope with Covid.
He continued: “That is a matter for the Chancellor.
“Nothing is ruled in and nothing is ruled out, but the key is to try and re-inflate the economy as quickly as possible, and then we can make decisions after that.”
Reminded a ban on tax rises had been in the 2019 manifesto, Jack responded: “Yes.”
Asked if that might change, he said: “It’s a matter for the Chancellor. It’s a matter for him for the future. I’m telling you the government’s strategy at the moment, which is to re-inflate the economy as quickly as possible.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel