ALL Under One Banner’s new grassroots Yes campaign is at the centre of a major row after taking the name of an existing Gaelic-speaking group.
The new organisation is known as Yes Alba, and was set up to “build bonds of respect and common purpose” among independence supporters.
However, Yes Alba already exists. It was created in the run up to the 2014 independence referendum as a Gaelic-language grassroots group. Their Facebook page has more than 31,000 likes.
READ MORE: Yes Alba: Top indy activists and SNP MP elected to lead new organisation
Responding to criticism on social media last night, AUOB said: “Yes Alba is a, perfectly feasible, working name for the new National membership organisation – subject to the decision making of the National committee, which has only just been elected and so hasn't met yet.”
AUOB will not be changing our name. Yes Alba is a, perfectly feasible, working name for the new National membership organisation- subject to the decision making of the National committee, which has only just been elected and so hasn't met yet.
— All Under One Banner (@AUOBALBA) December 5, 2020
The organisation added: “Alba is a name for Scotland. There are great opportunities for the language if the National Yes membership org uses it. The defensiveness over the name doesn't seem respective, as Alba is a Scottish name, and Gaelic a Native language of Scotland.
“Do please reflect that Gaelic speakers don't own Gaelic words. Alba is not owned by anyone. Gaelic is a Native language of Scotland, there is not a separate country here.”
The Daily Gael twitter account posted: “Trying not to overreact here, but telling a people they don't own their words is next level colonialist narrative, from a group that supposedly wants to see a better country.”
Eoghan Mhic said the unwillingness to back down meant that the group’s name was a misnomer: “All under one banner unless you speak Gaelic, then it's shut up Gael and know your place in English speaking Scotland.”
Cruithneach tweeted: "What AUOB is doing is unilaterally declaring, from a majority, English-speaking perspective, that Gaelic's place in the national movement is to be a decoration, a symbol, something to be used superficially and not substantively."
An Tuiseal Ginideach said it was "Impiriúlachas cultúrtha" – cultural imperialism.
"This lot stole the name of a Gàidhlig-language pro-independence group, and refuse to give it back.
"Is this any better than Westminster?"
Cultural imperialism - Impiriúlachas cultúrtha.
— An Tuiseal Ginideach (@AnTuisealGinid1) December 6, 2020
This lot stole the name of a Gàidhlig-language pro-independence group, and refuse to give it back.
Is this any better than Westminster? #Gàidhlig https://t.co/oSZLTgaAz9
Robbie Anndra MacLeòid said: "When it comes to the next IndyRef, Gaels should have access to the space YesAlba created for them in 2014. They shouldn't have to make a new one, put all that work in again to establish themselves, or rename, just because AUOB fancy pinching the name."
Both AUOB and the Gaelic speaking Yes Alba have been approached for comment.
Earlier this week, AUOB unveiled the results of elections to their new committee. Among the successful candidates was National columnist and former SNP MSP George Kerevan, blogger and former ambassador Craig Murray and SNP MP Angus MacNeil.
A statement from AUOB read: “Many congratulations to those who were successful. Together you will shoulder the task of establishing good governance for a new organisation and of achieving that quickly. Now progress demands discussion, hard work and compromise. This is surely progress for the Yes movement.
“It’s vital that this group meets urgently to build bonds of respect and common purpose and to get on with the most pressing tasks of establishing the organisation towards the 1st January 2021 launch."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel