A FORMER editor of The Sun has been blasted on social media for branding Scotland “Jockestan” and the First Minister a “nauseating dwarf”.
Kelvin MacKenzie, who was also a columnist for The Sun until 2017 when he was let go for comparing a young mixed-race footballer to “a gorilla in the zoo”, also suggested that the SNP were the “Snidey Nasty Party”.
The Englishman, from Kent, seemingly took issue with Nicola Sturgeon’s reported unhappiness at a royal visit coming in the midst of a pandemic and a ban on all but essential travel.
Prince William and his wife Kate today came to Scotland to “thank frontline staff” for their efforts in the fight against Covid.
Sturgeon said at today’s coronavirus briefing that the Scottish Government “was advised about the intention to visit, and we made sure that the royal household were aware, as you would expect, of all of the restrictions in place in Scotland, so that could inform both the decision and the planning of the visit.
READ MORE: 'Aren’t we all in a pandemic?' Devi Sridhar hits out at William and Kate's Edinburgh visit
"But I think any questions about that should be directed to the royal household."
In response, the former Sun editor wrote: “That nauseating dwarf Nicola Sturgeon tried to warn off William and Kate from Jockestan claiming they broke Covid travel rules.
“The royal couple took no notice and met grateful Scottish Ambulance workers as planned. SNP. The Snidey Nasty Party.”
Social media users took issue with MacKenzie’s comments. One said: “Snidey Nasty Party, what are you? 12?” while others shared gifs of Scots actor Brian Cox and Gordon Ramsey telling the Englishman to “F*ck off”.
— Fiona Davidson 🏴 #IAmEuropean 🇪🇺 (@fiona_dav) December 7, 2020
Another Twitter user wrote: “So much of this tweet is offensive. Still, it certainly helps the indy cause so I suppose [Kelvin MacKenzie] still has some purpose.”
Others took calmer tones, saying: “You might like to look at the wording in your tweet and think again about who’s being snidey and nasty” or suggesting that the royals had in fact been in the wrong.
One user said: “Actually, they should be setting an example not breaking the rules we are being asked to adhere to!” while another added: “Love Kate and William but I feel this trip at this time is inappropriate.
“We are in a pandemic and need to be aware of safeguarding.”
MacKenzie has previously been embroiled in controversy after attacking Scotland and its people, who he called “tartan tosspots”.
Referring to the lower life expectancy north of the Border, said: “The good news is that [the Scots] are dying sooner than the rest of us."
Speaking in his own defence, MacKenzie said: "If a columnist in the Sunday Herald described the English as tosspots, nobody would give a damn. Scots are extremely sensitive about the position they find themselves in, which is having to take money from London.”
READ MORE: 'She has no right to stop it': Tory rages at Nicola Sturgeon over royal visit
MacKenzie describes himself as the “most successful Editor of The Sun” in his Twitter profile. He left that position after 13 years in 1994, following more than a decade of controversy around stories he published which were entirely fabricated.
These included claims that Sting had admitted to taking drugs (he had not), claims Elton John had had sex with rent boys (he had not), an interview with war veteran Simon Weston which was completely fake, and claims Freddie Starr had eaten a hamster (he had not).
Perhaps MacKenzie’s most damaging claims came around the time of the Hillsborough disaster, which saw 96 fans of Liverpool football club crushed at the stadium in Sheffield.
The then-editor’s front page, which included claims that Liverpool fans had picked pockets of the dead and urinated on police, led to a boycott of the newspaper in the Merseyside city which still endures today.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel