CLAIM
“You have actually done worse than England in dealing with the Covid-19 second wave… Have you let Scotland down?” – Andrew Marr questioning Nicola Sturgeon, November 29, 2020.
DOORSTEP ANSWER
According to the Conservative Government’s own figures, the Covid death toll in Scotland per 100,000 is seven per cent lower than in England since the pandemic began.
BACKGROUND
During his TV interview with the First Minister on Sunday November 29, Andrew Marr put on screen a snapshot of figures purporting to show that deaths from Covid-19 in Scotland were running far ahead of those in England, on a proportional basis. Marr berated the FM: “Week after week the Scottish [Covid] death rate is worse than the English … Have you let the people of Scotland down?”
READ MORE: Sarah Vine claims royal tour has damaged Nicola Sturgeon's independence hopes
The figures Marr was using covered only four weeks of the pandemic out of 46. He gave no explanation of why these had been plucked – we assume because they were the most recent. He did not refer to the fact that Covid death rates – atypically – had accelerated over England’s in the other devolved administrations. He made no reference to the dynamics and timing of the second wave of the pandemic in the various UK nations and regions.
What is the truth about Covid death rates across the UK – remembering, as the FM pointed out to Marr - is that any death is a tragedy.
WHO IS ANDREW MARR?
Glasgow-born Andrew Marr is the anchor of the eponymous BBC flagship news programme broadcast on Sunday mornings. The BBC claims the show gets a regular 2 million viewers. Marr went to Loretto, a private school, and graduated from Cambridge University before becoming a journalist.
TOTAL DEATHS
The Marr Show chose to highlight only four weeks (43-47). A more accurate approach would be to look at the overall picture since the pandemic began, rather than isolate random weeks.
Data on the official UK Government website dated December 1, 2020 (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths) reports 59,618 deaths in England with Covid-19 on the death certificate since the pandemic began, compared to 5380 in Scotland.
According to the UK Government source, this yields a death rate per 100,000 of population at 105.9 in England and 98.5 in Scotland. The equivalent rate for Wales is 109.5 deaths per 100,000 and in Northern Ireland 68.7.
This evidence (which is accurate to November 20) shows that the death rate in Scotland over the course of the crisis is roughly 7 percentage points lower than in England – though any death is a tragedy. On this basis, Andrew Marr’s questioning was based on a false premise.
Note that recording data on Covid deaths is an inexact science and figures vary between jurisdictions and depending on time lapses. However, we have reported here the UK Government’s aggregated figures, which clearly show the Scottish death rate to be lower than that of England, over the whole pandemic.
DEATHS IN THE SECOND WAVE
However, it is true that, when the so-called second wave of the pandemic started in October, there was an apparent acceleration of weekly deaths in Scotland (and Wales and Northern Ireland) compared to England, though deaths in England were also rising in absolute terms. This was a reverse of the experience during the first wave, in the spring of 2020.
Two things explain this. First, the Scottish Government reacted faster than the UK Government during the first wave, dampening the course of the pandemic relative to England. The second wave hit more uniformly and both governments reacted in real time.
Second, the second wave hit England in a differentiated form, with the impact being highly regionalised and specific to the poorest urban areas. Averaging out the recent English Covid death toll across the country obscures the appallingly high death rate associated with big urban conurbations. These are the more appropriate comparators with Scotland.
Looking at deaths per 100,000 in comparable English regions, since the pandemic began, the toll is much worse than in Scotland.
READ MORE: 40 English mayors send letter asking Boris Johnson to save 'precious' Union
Deaths from Covid per 100,000 in the English North West averages at 151 compared to 98.5 in Scotland – a whole 50 per cent worse. In the North East, the ratio is 142.2 and in Yorkshire and Humber it is 122.
In big English towns, the Covid death toll per 100,000 is staggering: Tameside stands at 217.2 and Liverpool 178.9. Even in the worst affected urban zones in Scotland, these tragic numbers are not seen. The highest figure is in West Dunbartonshire at 159. Glasgow City registers at 127.
One key reason for the poor English statistics is the premature ending of the first lockdown. This occurred because the Conservative Government was in a rush to re-start the economy, especially in the hard-hit northern towns which the Tories had captured electorally in the 2019 General Election. But ending the lockdown helped trigger a second wave of infections. This second wave proved so infectious in parts of urban England - in mid-October 40 per cent of all coronavirus cases in England were in Greater Liverpool - that a complete lockdown had to be re-introduced.
The second wave only spread to Scotland after it had taken hold in England. Andrew Marr’s reference to the rising death toll in Scotland sidestepped the fact that a worse relapse had already occurred in England, forcing the Johnson Government to U-turn on its premature re-boot of the economy. In effect, the Scottish Government was having to cope with a problem made in England.
WHAT THE BBC DID NOT SAY
The Marr interview focused on a small set of weekly figures from the second wave of the pandemic. No one denies the existence of the second wave. But how has the Scottish Government dealt with it compared to the first wave? That is the appropriate question.
Here is the verdict of Professor Sheila Bird, former programme leader at the MRC Biostatistics Unit: “The first 11 weeks of wave 2 have claimed about only a fifth of the lives that ended as Covid-mention deaths in the first 11 weeks of wave 1… we and our governments should take some heart; but not rest on our laurels nor let up on safeguarding each other.”
FACTCHECK RATING: BBC being selective – as usual
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel