NICOLA Sturgeon has rejected claims she shared confidential allegations of harassment made against Alex Salmond with her husband, telling MSPs she is the First Minister and not an office gossip.
The comments came during a heated exchange with Ruth Davidson in Holyrood, with the Tory chief raising Peter Murrell’s evidence in front of the Scottish Parliament committee probing the Government’s botched handling of allegations made against the former SNP leader.
Sturgeon’s husband, who is the SNP’s chief executive, has been criticised by opposition MSPs over “contradictions and discrepancies” in his testimony.
In Tuesday’s committee session, Murrell was asked about the meetings between Salmond and Sturgeon at the couple’s home.
He said he had not known about the misconduct allegations against Salmond until they became public. He told MSPs that Sturgeon had not told him because the investigation was government business, which, as party chief executive, he was excluded from hearing.
Sturgeon has told parliament that no records of the meeting were taken because she was acting in her capacity as SNP leader and not as First Minister. Under the ministerial code, if the meetings were government business they should have a civil servant present or a written record of the discussion.
During yesterday’s First Minister’s Questions, Davidson asked Sturgeon whose story does she “find most believable, Peter Murrell’s, or her own?”
The SNP leader told the Tory: “The fact of the matter is my husband had no role in these meetings, he had no role in the matters under investigation by the committee.
“Ruth Davidson might want to attack my husband and use him as a weapon against me. People will draw their own conclusions about that, but it doesn’t change the basic fact of the matter that he had no role in these issues.”
Davidson rejected the claim she was using Murrell as a weapon: “I’m asking about this because a group of women who came forward were utterly let down by the First Minister’s Government and the fallout from that is still going on.”
Sturgeon said that her priority “was protecting the confidentiality and the integrity of the process”.
She added: “Now the committee will have the opportunity to question me on that, and it’s right and proper they do so, it is because I do care about the implications of this both for women who came forward with complaints and for any woman who might feel the need to come forward with complaints in the future.
READ MORE: FMQs: Richard Leonard slammed for claim Edinburgh Covid level is 'political'
“This is an inquiry into an investigation of sexual harassment and that is why we should all treat it seriously. But those who choose instead to indulge wild conspiracy theories I think make it less likely rather than more lately that we learn the lessons on that.”
Davidson said Sturgeon seemed “to think that all of our heads button up the back”.
She added: “Here’s what we’re being asked to accept – that the chief executive of the SNP popped his head round the door to find the First Minister of Scotland, coincidentally his wife, her predecessor Alex Salmond, his chief of staff, her chief of staff, and Mr Salmond’s lawyer, all sitting unannounced in his living room. And he never asks a single question then, or since, of what that’s all about.
“And this morning, we now learn that Angus Robertson, a former deputy leader to Nicola Sturgeon, was told 11 years ago of alleged inappropriateness by Mr Salmond. Eleven years. And I think the First Minister’s line is that she had no idea about that either. Another allegation that just passed her by.
“Does she really think that sounds plausible and is it seriously what the First Minister is asking us to believe?”
“Yes,” Sturgeon replied, “because it happens to be the truth and that may not suit what Ruth Davidson wants to be the situation, but I’m afraid that is the situation.
“And on the issue of conversations or lack of conversations between me and my husband, I sometimes wonder if the opposition here is revealing more about themselves than they are about me. The fact of the matter is, I am First Minister of Scotland, I deal with confidential matters every single day of my life.
“These range from national security matters through to market-sensitive commercial matters and a whole range of things in between, and, I don’t gossip about these things, even to my husband.
“I am the First Minister of the country, not the office gossip, and I take my responsibilities in that role extremely seriously.”
Earlier, in a letter to the Holyrood inquiry, Angus Robertson revealed he spoke to Salmond about his behaviour with female staff at Edinburgh Airport.
“In 2009 I was called by an Edinburgh Airport manager about Alex Salmond’s perceived ‘inappropriateness’ towards female staff at the airport,” said Robertson.
“I was asked if I could informally broach the subject with Mr Salmond to make him aware of this perception. I raised the matter directly with Mr Salmond, who denied he had acted inappropriately in any way.
“I communicated back to the Edinburgh Airport manager that a conversation had happened. The matter being resolved, and without a formal complaint having been made, it was not reported further.”
Meanwhile, it’s also emerged that a senior government official texted a woman who had raised concerns about Salmond’s conduct to inform her of another misconduct complaint.
Barbara Allison, the director of communications, ministerial support and facilities, told the woman, identified as Ms B, about “contact” from another woman, known as Ms A, regarding the former First Minister’s behaviour.
Salmond’s allies have claimed he was the victim of a high-level conspiracy. Sturgeon has dismissed this.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel