A MAN has been found guilty under the Terrorism Act of possessing weapons including a crossbow and machete.
Gabrielle Friel, 22, was found guilty of possessing the weapons at various locations in Edinburgh last summer including his home, a social work centre and a hospital in circumstances giving rise to the reasonable suspicion that possessing them was for a purpose connected with terrorism.
A second charge that he prepared for terrorist acts by researching spree killings, particularly those connected with incels – people who are involuntarily celibate – was found not proven, following a five-day trial at the High Court in Edinburgh.
As part of this charge, Friel was accused of having “expressed affinity with and sympathy for one incel-motivated mass murderer” and to have expressed “a desire to carry out a spree killing mass murder”.
The weapons he was found guilty of possessing between June 1 and August 16 last year are a crossbow, scope, crossbow arrows, a machete as well as a ballistic vest.
Judge Lord Beckett told him: “You have been found guilty of charge one, which is a very serious charge.
“Before dealing with you I can’t proceed without calling for a criminal justice social work report.”
He deferred sentencing until January 12 but told members of the jury it was likely to be “substantial prison sentence” and thanked them for their efforts.
Friel denied both charges and gave evidence in his own defence during the trial.
The court was told he amassed weapons last summer as he wanted to commit “suicide by cop” to help end his violent thoughts.
Friel said mass shooting was a “fantasy” for him and he “felt for” incel mass murderer Elliot Rodger, but denied being an incel and described killers as “evil”.
The 2014 Isla Vista killer Rodger – who murdered six people and injured 14 others – has been described as a trigger moment for the misogynistic subculture, which often involves ideas of violence towards women due to a lack of sexual activity.
Friel had told a doctor he wanted to “carry out a mass shooting” and his social worker reported that he appeared to “almost idolise” Rodger.
The court heard his social worker Sarah Drummond’s email to his psychiatrist Dr Alexander Quinn said: “He feels jealous of others and feels that no girls are interested in him.
“He wants to project his anger on to the world and described media attention from mass killing as the the only way the world would take notice.”
The court heard agreed evidence that Friel ordered the crossbow, bolts, telescopic sight, machete and ballistic vest online, and had them delivered to his home last summer.
Friel claimed he also wanted to commit “suicide by cop” when he stabbed a police officer at Edinburgh College’s Granton campus in November 2017.
He said fears he would fail a test had triggered negative thoughts of being bullied at high school in Singapore and previous attempts to take his own life, which led to further attempts before the college incident.
The court heard Friel was sentenced to 300 hours of community service after pleading guilty at a hearing in June 2018 to the stabbing, which endangered the officer’s life.
Following the conviction, Police Scotland’s Assistant Chief Constable for counter-terrorism Pat Campbell said: “Gabrielle Friel is a potentially dangerous and disaffected individual, and Police Scotland welcomes the outcome of this case as the consequences of his actions could have been catastrophic.”
He praised health and social care workers and police for enabling early intervention and called on people to contact Police Scotland if they have concerns someone is becoming radicalised.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here