TORY minister Jacob Rees Mogg has reacted furiously to UNICEF’s programme to feed starving kids in the UK, branding it "shameful" and “cheap".
He said the humanitarian agency were playing politics.
Earlier this week, the UN agency launched a domestic emergency response in the UK for the first time in its more than 70-year history, promising £25,000 to the community project School Food Matters.
READ MORE: Unicef to help feed children in the UK for first time in 70 years
The money will be used to supply 18,000 nutritious breakfasts to 25 schools in South London over the two-week Christmas holidays and February half-term.
The food delivery firm Abel & Cole will also provide 1.2 tonnes of fruit and veg worth £4500 to include in the boxes.
Anna Kettley, the director of programmes at Unicef UK, said the emergency response was “introduced to tackle the unprecedented impact of the coronavirus crisis and reach the families most in need.”
The initiative was raised in the Commons on Thursday during Business Questions.
Labour MP Zarah Sultana compared the plight of the children in South London to the rising fortunes of Tory donors.
Earlier, analysis by the New York Times revealed that of the roughly $22bn worth of UK government contracts that have been made public, about $11bn went to companies either run by "friends and associates of politicians in the Tories or with no prior experience or a history of controversy."
READ MORE: Scathing New York Times pieces details Tory 'waste, negligence and cronyism'
Sultana said: “For the first time ever Unicef, the UN agency responsible for providing humanitarian aid to children, is having to feed working class kids in the UK.
“But while children go hungry, a wealthy few enjoy obscene riches from Tory donors handed billions in dodgy Covid contracts, or people like the leader of the house who is reportedly in line to receive an £800,000 dividend payout this year.
“So, will he give government time to discuss the need to make him and his super rich chums, pay their fair share, so we can end the grotesque inequality that scars our society?”
Rees-Mogg said: “I think it's a real scandal that Unicef should be playing politics in this way when it is meant to be looking after people in the poorest, the most deprived countries in the world, where people are starving, where there are famines, and where there are civil wars, and they make cheap political points of this kind, giving I think £25,000 to one council.
“It is a political stunt of the lowest order. What is this government doing about child poverty? We are committed to our manifesto pledge to reduce child poverty. We've expanded free school meals for all five to seven year olds benefiting 1.4 million children, we’ve doubled free childcare for eligible working parents, and will establish a one billion childcare plan giving parents support and freedom to look after children.
"We're spending £400m pounds of taxpayers money to support children, families and the most vulnerable over winter and through 2021.
“Since 2010 to 2018/19, there are 100,000 fewer children in absolute poverty in this country. This is a record of success of conservatism and Unicef should be ashamed”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel