SUSPENDED MP Drew Hendry has said that his “spontaneous” protest in the House of Commons on Wednesday was necessary to ensure the Tories’ Internal Market Bill “didn’t go through without being marked”.
The SNP member of parliament told The National that he had not planned the protest which led to his suspension, but when he heard parliamentary under-secretary Paul Scully make it “absolutely clear that what we’d been warning about was going to happen at the whim of the UK Government” he felt compelled to protest.
Hendry could be heard shouting in the Commons that the bill was a “democratic disgrace”, before he took up the ceremonial mace and tried to exit the House.
He was stopped by doorkeepers and handed the mace, which the Commons cannot legally sit without, back.
READ MORE: WATCH: SNP MP suspended from Commons after objections to Tory Brexit bill
The MP for Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey said he wanted to show that his party had “done absolutely everything that we possibly could to prevent this assault on Scotland’s democracy and elected parliament”.
Asked how he felt after his suspension, Hendry said: “Honestly it didn’t really affect me one way or the other, I just felt like I’d been doing my job.
“The important thing was that people were made more aware of what was happening with the bill and what it means for Scotland, our parliament, and the powers that are devolved.
“Almost every aspect of Scottish life is affected by it. The bill allows UK ministers to control spending in devolved areas of economic development, infrastructure, cultural activities, regional development, education, water, power, gas, telecoms, railways, health, housing, and justice, amongst other things.
“Nobody in Scotland voted to have a Tory Government making these decisions, they haven’t done that since the early 1950s.”
In the wake of Hendry’s suspension, Conservative representatives from both Holyrood and Westminster echoed each other in calling the SNP MP’s protest “childish”.
MSP Jamie Halcro Johnston said it had been “embarrassing and childish behaviour” and that Hendry should “apologise immediately”.
At Westminster, Jacob Rees-Mogg dodged a question on remote participation from SNP chief whip Patrick Grady to instead label Hendry’s protest a “silly, childish, babyish display”.
Responding, Hendry told the National that it had been “the right thing to do to expose what is happening with this bill”.
“[Those Tories] might feel in their own immaturity that they don’t want to have to face the music or be exposed on these things, but I certainly wasn’t going to stand by and not make the point that this is an assault on devolution.
“The only point in the bill that was left was to take powers from the devolved parliaments.”
Hendry also stressed that one of the most dangerous aspects of the bill would allow private companies to take Scottish public bodies to court over competition rules.
READ MORE: Jacob Rees Mogg claims Unicef plan to feed hungry kids in UK is 'cheap politics'
“For example,” he explained, “Scottish Water is a publicly owned company and if one of the private water companies wanted to take them to court the avenue is now there, open for stealth privatisation.”
Asked if those concerns were realistic in light of the reassurances from Westminster that this would not happen, Hendry said: “People have to ask themselves if they trust the words of the Tory Government.
“Time and time again they’ve facilitated contracts for their chums and donors. I think it’s an absolutely clear danger that the Internal Market Bill now opens up more opportunities for private companies to challenge the publicly owned public sector companies in Scotland.”
Asked if the SNP group might consider following him out of the House, as they did Ian Blackford in 2018, or even a full boycott of Westminster, Hendry said it was “not something that is practical at this particular time”.
He went on: “We had to be there in order to make sure that the Internal Market Bill was exposed for what it was, and I think that was the right thing to do.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel