NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Boris Johnson’s government of selling out the Scottish fishing industry with the new Brexit deal.
The agreement struck between Downing Street and Brussels includes a transition period allowing EU and UK fishing vessels access to each other's waters for another five years.
The First Minister commented: “The fact that many predicted it, doesn’t make it any less galling.
“The Tories have sold out Scottish fishing all over again. Promises they knew couldn’t be delivered, duly broken.”
It comes after the National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations (NFFO) said that the Tory government had only secured "a fraction of what the UK has a right to under international law".
READ MORE: Furious business chiefs accuse Boris Johnson of 'bottling' Brexit deal
The draft Brexit agreement, released on Boxing Day morning, contains numerous pages dedicated entirely to fishing policy in the UK and EU's new relationship, and asserts the "sovereign rights" of EU states and the UK "for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving and managing the living resources in their waters".
The fact that many predicted it, doesn’t make it any less galling. The Tories have sold out Scottish fishing all over again. Promises they knew couldn’t be delivered, duly broken. https://t.co/2oOV7nazm4
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) December 26, 2020
However, it also includes a line on "the social and economic benefits of a further period of stability, during which fishers would be permitted until June 30 2026 to continue to enter the waters of the other party".
Barrie Deas, chief of the NFFO, said the deal "will inevitably be seen by the fishing industry as a defeat".
He explained: "When push came to shove, despite the legal, moral and political strength of our case, fishing was sacrificed for other national objectives.
"Lacking legal, moral, or political negotiating leverage on fish, the EU made the whole trade deal contingent on a UK surrender on fisheries.
"In the end-game, the Prime Minister made the call and caved in on fish, despite the rhetoric and assurances that he would not do what Ted Heath did in 1973."
READ MORE: UK will NOT have veto on an independent Scotland rejoining the EU
An industry source said "a lot of fishers will be bitterly disappointed" by the deal, but added: "Perhaps they had unrealistic expectations fuelled by the blowhard Brexit PR."
A senior member of the UK's negotiating team has since defended the agreement, and described fish as "one of the areas where we had to compromise somewhat", but said this had been done by "both sides".
The official said: "The crucial thing on fisheries policy is that although there is a transition, at the end of the transition it returns to normal arrangements, and we have full control over our waters.
"There's a transition to that point and ideally we would've got out of it a bit faster, but where we've got to is acceptable and offers gains for the fisheries industry in the short run and a huge right to control everything and work within that after this five-and-a-half-year transition."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel