THE UK Government’s last-minute decision to not participate in Erasmus+ has caused an outcry.
The popular scheme, which facilitates around 35,000 UK students a period of study in Europe every year, has existed since 1987. Despite assurances that the UK’s participation in the scheme was safe, the UK Government has announced that a new, UK-wide “Turing Scheme” will be launched to offer global opportunities to outgoing UK students.
But Erasmus is much more than the university student exchange scheme is most well-known for: it works on the basis of a complex multi-annual programme covering all kinds of exchanges with schools, vocational work placements and so on.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon to ask Westminster for Scotland to stay in EU's Erasmus scheme
Its overall purpose is to facilitate Europeans getting to know each other better but also to help combat problems, such as youth unemployment, by increasingly valuable skills. The wide-ranging nature of the scheme explains why the budget appears to be large – and too large for the UK Government to stomach.
The EU was not, it seems, ready to allow the UK to “cherry pick” only parts of the scheme. For students in Northern Ireland, the Irish government has stepped in with a workaround, allowing students there to continue to participate.
What about Scotland? Is there a way for students at Scottish institutions to participate in the future?
This would be challenging to resolve. Education is a devolved matter, but to be part of the Erasmus scheme requires signing up to the relevant EU law, which defines which states can take part in it.
The current regulation lists EEA states (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland), states who have started the accession process (such as Albania, North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey), and Switzerland as being able to negotiate a bilateral agreement with the EU to take part in the scheme. States covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy (across North Africa, the Middle East and Eastern Europe) can also conclude an agreement if they wish.
The UK would be in a similar position to Switzerland with an ability to make a bilateral agreement – if the cost can be settled.
The problem for Scotland signing up of its own accord is that international relations, including relations with the EU, is reserved under Schedule 5 of the Scotland Act 1998. So although participation by Scottish universities and students in Erasmus would no doubt be welcomed in the EU, it is tricky to see how the Scottish Government could sign up in the absence of power to sign international treaties.
READ MORE: The UK leaving Erasmus is miserable – but Scotland has options
The UK Government could conclude an EU agreement on Erasmus, but only one which could be used by Scottish universities. This option seems to be the one behind the Scottish Government’s announcement today that it would ask the UK Government to remain part of the scheme.
It seems unlikely that the UK Government will agree for political reasons, and would also undermine the “UK-wide” launch of its Turing Scheme. However, if the Scottish Government’s request was granted, this might also lead to a similar Welsh request, and a complex process of bargaining on costs and how UK immigration policy would apply to exchange students in the absence of free movement.
Erasmus has had an enormous impact on the lives of students and young people across Europe. Whilst the details of the Turing scheme have yet to emerge, replicating it in such a short period of time and on a limited budget might prove too ambitious – and risk current and future students losing out.
Paul James Cardwell is a Professor in Law at the University of Strathclyde whose research interests cover the European Union and the law and policy of its external relations
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel