PEOPLE in Scotland who were due to receive their second dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine from next week have been told their appointments will be pushed back by months.
The UK's four chief medical officers agreed that patients and health staff who had expected to be fully inoculated within a month would face delays of 12 weeks so that more people can receive their first jab.
The UK Government Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation also announced that they want to prioritise "as many people as possible on the Phase 1 JCVI priority list."
READ MORE: Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak urged to boost economic support amid 'perfect storm'
The chief medical officers of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland agreed getting a larger number of people vaccinated this way "is much more preferable".
But the decision comes despite guidance from vaccine manufacturer Pfizer, who says there is no data which demonstrates that protection after the first dose is sustained after 21 days.
And the British Medical Association said cancelling patients already booked in to receive their second doses was "grossly unfair".
A statement from Scotland's chief medical officer Dr Gregor Smith reads: "Those services that will be operational from Monday 4 January 2021 onwards should to ensure that all second dose appointments are booked in the 12th week post the first dose.
READ MORE: Covid-19: UK Government urged to close schools in England amid variant fears
"I recognise that the requirement to re-schedule second appointments is operationally difficult in the short term and may be unpopular with patients booked in for a second dose in the immediate future.
"However, for every 1000 people boosted with a second dose of covid-19 vaccine in January (who will as a result gain marginally on protection), 1000 new people would be delayed in receiving what amounts to very substantial initial protection which is in most cases is likely to raise them from 0% protected to at least 70% protected in typically 14-21 days."
A statement from Pfizer said: "Data from the phase three study demonstrated that, although partial protection from the vaccine appears to begin as early as 12 days after the first dose, two doses of the vaccine are required to provide the maximum protection against the disease, a vaccine efficacy of 95 per cent."
"There are no data to demonstrate that protection after the first dose is sustained after 21 days."
On Friday, Dr Christine Tait-Burkard, of the University of Edinburgh, said it makes sense to vaccinate most of the population to try and cut the spread of the virus and to make the vaccine last longer.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: The areas in Scotland with most Covid cases
She told BBC Breakfast: “Overall, it makes sense to get more of the population vaccinated but I understand that it will have caused some concern for the people who were already scheduled for the second dose of the vaccine and they will have to wait longer, but the protection is very good from a single dose.”
She believes the Pfizer vaccine will still be used for vulnerable people while the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, where more doses are available, can be rolled out much faster.
She suggested the army could used in the vaccine rollout which needs to be done quickly as “the NHS being under so much strain from the rising caseloads of covid that this needs to be done with additional help”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel