A FORMER SNP deputy leader has called for Nicola Sturgeon to "deprioritise" a second independence referendum and focus instead on the economic crisis caused by the pandemic.
Jim Sillars said the First Minister “would be wise to place independence and a referendum more like sixth on the list of priorities for the new parliament, bringing her into line with the public’s view”.
Some 17 successive polls have given a majority in favour of Scottish independence, with two surveys putting support at a record 58%.
However, Boris Johnson has repeated ruled out handing over powers to Holyrood to hold a new vote on independence on terms agreed by the UK and Scottish Governments.
Sturgeon has said she hopes to hold indyref2 this year but Sillars suggested it should rank lower on her agenda, in line with what matters most to the Scottish people.
He said Scotland needed “a re-ordering of priorities – as we have become transfixed on independence and how to get a referendum”.
Writing in the Sunday Times, he said: "First minister Nicola Sturgeon would be wise to place independence and referendum more like sixth on the list of priorities for the new parliament, bringing her into line with the public’s view. But that is a tall order.
"Sturgeon, SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford and others have wound up the independence activists to such a pitch, it would take a level of wisdom and courage so far missing to talk them down to the new reality."
Sillars said in the run up to the Holyrood elections in May that Sturgeon should place independence and a referendum sixth on the list of priorities for the new parliament.
He went on to criticise the SNP's record in government, describing it as "the epitome of incompetence" due to the Ferguson Marine ferry contract, care home and hospital deaths and the "woke-inspired Hate Crime Bill".
Sillars, who supports independence but voted leave in the Brexit referendum, says the SNP faces a dilemma as more than one million Scots, including 300,000 independence supporters, voted to leave the EU.
"Is the SNP going to fight the May election asserting a vote for independence is also a mandate to rejoin the European Union?" he added. "Will we 300,000 be expected, like sheep, to accept that the sovereignty we want to win with independence will then be surrendered to the EU?
"How will Sturgeon convince us to accept that illogicality? Does she think we have not read the Lisbon treaty? More to the point, has she read it, with its allocation to small countries such as ours of just 1.5% in qualified majority voting?"
It comes as the Prime Minister told the Andrew Marr Show that there should not be another referendum on Scottish independence until 2055.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson rules out indyref2 until 2055 saying referendums are 'not jolly'
Johnson said people in the UK had had the chance to vote twice on EU membership in 1975 and 2016 and the period between them was "right" in terms of referendums.
"Referendums in my experience, in my direct experience in this country, are not jolly events. They don't have a notably unifying force in the national mood and they should be only once in a generation," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel