IT’S hard to know where to start in response to events in the US. The scenes at the Capitol in Washington DC should have shocked us, of course. No doubt there are people who genuinely found it hard to believe what they were witnessing, and who perhaps feel more traumatised and insecure than they ever have about their political system.
But in truth nobody should have been surprised, either at what happened or at the underlying issues it exposed. And nobody here should comfort themselves with the idea that those issues are uniquely American.
Perhaps the most impressive response has come from many Black Lives Matter activists, using the slogan “We’re not asking you to shoot them like you shoot us, we’re asking you to not shoot us like you don’t shoot them”.
It would be all too easy to look at the violent attempt to overthrow democracy, and to seek a response in kind. But ongoing escalation can only lead us to an even worse position than the one Trump has brought about.
It’s important to distinguish between those who have deliberately cultivated this situation – not just Trump himself and his inner circle, but those who have facilitated him, enabled him, legitimised him and built a movement around him – and others who have been swept along, subjected to a barrage of disinformation and conspiracy theory, their vulnerabilities exploited and their legitimate grievances weaponised. It’s also important to look back to see how this toxic movement took root, rather than only looking at its violent expression this week.
READ MORE: David Pratt: After insurrection in the Capitol, what next for Donald Trump?
We can all name some of the worst culprits. Trump and many of his family and business cronies. Steve Bannon. Nigel Farage. Many other names leap to mind. It’s not just the political and media figures of the “fringe” far right though – the same values permeate mainstream media outlets such as the Murdoch empire, and in this country publications including the Daily Mail and the Spectator. The billionaire press are as culpable as any Breitbart hack.
And I struggle to find words for the contempt I feel for the politicians who are busy denouncing Trump now, after he has lost an election and just days before he leaves office, but who feted him and boosted him for years before. That goes for the likes of Mitch McConnell in the US, but also for people such as Michael Gove and Boris Johnson at UK level, and there are a fair few Scottish politicians in this category, too.
There’s Murdo Fraser, who as a Holyrood committee convener bounced MSPs into calling the notorious climate denier Trump as a witness on, of all things, renewable energy. And of course we mustn’t forget the tawdry scenes of both Jack McConnell and Alex Salmond each using their position as First Minister to court the business of a man they already knew to be a racist, a teller of lies, a conspiracy pedlar and a notoriously untrustworthy, bullying property developer.
But these political and media figures, culpable as they are, sit in a different category to the many victims of online radicalisation which the Trump movement and its merchants of grift have brought about.
I hope Trump and those who enabled him get what’s coming to them – political and legal accountability and the prospect of jail time. I hope the US can look forward to some kind of recovery from the disease, of which Trump was only the most obvious symptom. But if we’re to guard against the same disease developing here, we need to look at how it took root. There are too many disturbing parallels to allow any complacency.
CONSPIRACY theories, like climate denial, don’t have the same political space here that they do in the US, but they are by no means absent, as anyone can see from the abuse that many of the youth climate strikers have been subjected to.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: After deadly US violence, Trump must not be allowed into Scotland
The UK remains in deep denial about its own white supremacist history, and the racist backlash against Black Lives Matter and the drenching of the Edward Coulston statue exposed this.
Scotland is also often guilty of denial about its role in imperialism. And while both Unionism and independence are capable of being expressed without nationalist exceptionalism, you don’t have to look far to see it in part of both movements. We need the courage to self-reflect on this, instead of pretending it’s not there.
And the growth of movements which demonise marginalised groups and misrepresent their equal rights as a threat to others is far from unknown here either – just a few years ago political transphobia and the call for “bathroom bills” to exclude trans people from public spaces was a source of dismay from progressives looking at the US.
Now, they have embedded themselves within the media and political parties in this country, another form of online populist radicalisation which Trump weaponised for his own ends.
If Trump was the symptom not the disease, we need to be fearless in identifying the symptoms afflicting our own political culture too, or we risk finding that it’s too late to stop the disease from taking hold.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel