A FORMER Justice Secretary has accused the Crown Office of abusing its power in a case against a prominent supporter of Alex Salmond.
The claim came after blogger Mark Hirst was cleared of threatening behaviour towards witnesses in the former First Minister’s sexual assault trial.
The Crown said that in a video on his website, he had threatened to name the woman who complained about Salmond.
In the clip, Hirst said: “I suspect very strongly that as this rumbles on, that precious anonymity that they’ve sought will not be continued.
“Because these women, and not just these women, some of the people involved in this, are senior members of the Scottish Government, senior members of the SNP.”
He continued: “And they’ve been involved in this active collusion to try to destroy Alex Salmond’s reputation and there’s not a cat’s chance in hell that they’re going to get away with that.
“So they’re going to reap a whirlwind, no question about it.
“As soon as this virus emergency is out the way, then there’s going to be a bit of reckoning takes place.
“We’ll clear out the soft independence supporters which are currently leading the party, that’s why we’ve seen no movement in nearly six years.”
READ MORE: Alex Salmond: 'Simply untrue' that key meeting with Nicola Sturgeon was not to discuss complaints
Hirst was charged with threatening or abusive behaviour after his home near Jedburgh, Roxburghshire, was visited by police.
Fraser Matheson, the procurator fiscal, said the choice of language could be seen as threatening.
Matheson said: “There is the implied threat that the identity of the complainers will not last and they will be identified.”
However, Sheriff Peter Paterson ruled that there was no case to answer, saying that Hirst had simply been giving his opinion on the situation within the SNP and “no more than that”.
MacAskill welcomed the verdict: “The Crown once again tarnished but justice prevails. Those damaging the institution need redded out. This is a pattern and an abuse of privilege.”
Hirst told The National: “I think there is a malignant, politically driven element within the Crown Office and has been there for some time. The Crown Office and Police Scotland have spent millions trying to first convict Alex and when that failed they’ve gone after prominent supporters of his. The prosecution against me should never have taken place. Apart from the advice I was getting from my own lawyers I was also receiving unsolicited messages from criminal lawyers across Scotland amazed at the resources that were directed on to me.”
He added: “No-one should have to go through what I have for simply expressing an opinion, recorded on a two minute video, in a field miles from anyone. The Crown Office are bringing the entire justice system into disrepute as a result of their ongoing actions against other allies of Mr Salmond. It is an outrage really.”
The Crown Office said they noted the decision, but declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article