CIVIL service head Leslie Evans is being used as a "punch bag" amidst political campaigning, a trade union leader claims.
The most senior civil servant in Scotland, Evans is the first woman to hold the role.
She commands a workforce of more than 6500 mandarins supporting the Scottish Government.
And she's also one of the prime figures in the divisive dispute between former First Minister Alex Salmond and current FM Nicola Sturgeon.
While Salmond was aquitted of sexual assault claims at the High Court in Edinburgh last year, a parliamentary enquiry is ongoing and has drawn scrutiny of Evans' professional actions.
It has also, according to the head of the FDA civil servants' trade union, led to "a media campaign, egged on by rent-a-quote politicians, which is aimed at hounding Ms Evans out of her role".
READ MORE: Douglas Ross fury as Leslie Evans rejects SNP 'propaganda' claim
Dave Penman makes the claims in an article for The Times newspaper today and says Evans is being used as "a convenient stick to beat the party of government with, from politicians who should — and do — know better".
The comments follow media reports about Evans' £250,000 pension pot and use of the Oasis song Wonderwall in a 2003 briefing to colleagues, with attention also given to the fact that her ex-musician husband Derek McVay is a former member of Edinburgh SNP.
Penman wrote: "What we are now witnessing is a media campaign, egged on by rent-a-quote politicians, which is aimed at hounding Ms Evans out of her role.
"This is not legitimate public or political interest; this is a concerted campaign aimed at undermining a public servant to further political ends.
"Anything that can be seen to undermine or attack her — from speeches she gave 18 years ago, to the value of her pension, and now the political affiliation of her husband, a private citizen — is all considered fair game."
He went on: "We need to continue to attract and retain the highest quality public servants for demanding jobs. But who would want to serve a government if they knew that their professional reputation would be trashed as soon as it was politically expedient to do so?
"It’s a reckless and destructive tactic, which will have a profound, long-term impact on public services. That’s something all political leaders should be worried about."
In a submission to the parliamentary enquiry, Salmond said he was persuaded by Sturgeon to rebutt two claims against him after receiving a letter from Evans, stating: "My view is now that it was believed that my submission of a rebuttal would weaken the case for judicial review (my involvement in rebutting the substance of the complaints being seen to cure the procedural unfairness)."
That was rejected by Sturgeon and cast as "false conspiracy theories" by her spokesperson.
Salmond initially called for Evans to quit when a judicial review found the Scottish Government's in-house probe into the accusations against him had been unlawful and affected by apparent bias. He was awarded more than £500,000 in the decision two years ago.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel